|
|
|||||||||||
Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS
Mental Health Review Tribunals (MHRTs) are intended to protect the liberty of the detained patient. In practice, however, they have been said to fall short of providing this safeguard. This is frequently for administrative reasons. We report a systematic examination of the pattern of delays in holding MHRTs. Our main finding is that delay cannot be attributed to a single factor but rather reflects the inherent complexity of some cases.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Obomanu and H. Kennedy Juridogenic' harm: statutory principles for the new mental health tribunals Psychiatr. Bull., September 1, 2001; 25(9): 331 - 333. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |