PB Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (1996) 20: 149-152. doi: 10.1192/pb.20.3.149
© 1996 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, I.

Rapid tranquillisation: a questionnaire survey of practice

Deborah Simpson, Senior Registrar in Psychiatry

Rehabilitation Service, Harrop House, Prestwich Hospital, Bury New Road, Prestwich, Manchester M25 3BC

Ian Anderson, Senior Lecturer in Psychiatry*

University of Manchester Department of Psychiatry, Rawnsley Building, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL

* Correspondence

A postal survey of the drug treatment of behavioural emergencies by senior registrars and consultants in psychiatry revealed that 90% would initially use a non-depot antipsychotic (including 24% who would combine it with a benzodiazepine if the situation warranted), and 10% the short-acting depot, zuclopenthixol acetate, with another antipsychotic or a benzodiazepine, or both. The choice was made from a restricted range of drugs, with haloperidol being the most popular antipsychotic and diazepam the most popular benzodiazepine. Half of respondents did not consider British National Formulary maximum dose recommendations to be useful for rapid tranquillisation and many would exceed them. A substantial minority did not consider that adequate resuscitation was available at their unit and deficiencies were revealed in the training of junior doctors and in the audit of rapid tranquillisation. Very few psychiatrists reported that their units had written guidelines.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
R. Macpherson, R. Dix, and S. Morgan
A growing evidence base for management guidelines: REVISITING... GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTELY DISTURBED PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., November 1, 2005; 11(6): 404 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
R. H. McALLISTER-WILLIAMS and I. N. FERRIER
Rapid tranquillisation: time for a reappraisal of options for parenteral therapy
The British Journal of Psychiatry, June 1, 2002; 180(6): 485 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
I. B. Kerr and D. Taylor
Acute disturbed or violent behaviour: principles of treatment
J Psychopharmacol, January 1, 1997; 11(3): 271 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1996 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.