Psychiatric Bulletin (1997) 21: 764-768. doi: 10.1192/pb.21.12.764
© 1997 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Gilluley, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by James, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Gilluley, P. L.

Psychotic patients and patent applications

The mad scientist revisited?

David V. James, Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist

Camlet Lodge RSU, Chase Farm Hospital Site, The Ridgeway, Enfield, Middlesex EN2 8JL,

Paul L. Gilluley, Registrar in Forensic Psychiatry

Henry Rollin Unit

The clinical observation that some psychotic patients were attempting to register their ideas as patents prompted a survey of published patents. The hypothesis was that, given supposed links between creativity and mental illness, the Patent Office might be a repository of psychotic ideas. Searches were made on specific topics suggested by our patients' applications. A survey was undertaken of unusual patents in the collection as a whole, and of authors with unusual track records. Bizarre and eccentric patents were identified, but patents of the sort that our patients attempted to register were absent. Possible explanations for this result are discussed.