PB E-mail content delivery - eTOCs !
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (1997) 21: 364-366. doi: 10.1192/pb.21.6.364
© 1997 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davison, P.
Right arrow Articles by de Albeniz, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davison, P.
Right arrow Articles by de Albeniz, A. P.

Reports prepared for Mental Health Review Tribunals and Managers' Reviews

Phil Davison, Senior Registrar

Warneford Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7JX

Alberto Perez de Albeniz, Senior Registrar in Psychotherapy

Yew Tree House, 87 Radford Road, Leamington Spa CV31 1JQ

Little advice is offered in the literature for the novice report writer, despite the gravity of the situation, for example, a patient appealing against detention. Section 20, which renews the authority for detention after periods of 6 months or a year, is a useful reminder for clinicians, as it outlines the components that must be present in order for detention to continue.

This audit established guidelines for the completion of reports for Mental Health Review Tribunals and Managers' Reviews. A structure and list of ‘features to be included’ was complied. This was used to rate the standard of reports prepared in the Warneford Hospital between 1991–1993. Following peer consultation within the hospital, the guidelines were considered acceptable and useful. At re-audit after 8 months the standard of reports had improved in most respects.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
P. Egleston and M. D. Hunter
Improving the quality of medical reports to mental health review tribunals
Psychiatr. Bull., June 1, 2002; 26(6): 215 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1997 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.