PB RCPsych Publications
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (1998) 22: 695-697. doi: 10.1192/pb.22.11.695
© 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osborn, D. P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Osborn, D. P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, J. P.

Assessing the physical health of psychiatric patients

David P. J. Osborn, Research Registrar* and James P. Warner, Lecturer

University Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School (Royal Free Campus), Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF

* Correspondence

Aims and method Most medical diagnoses are made from the physical history alone. In the psychiatric literature, physical assessment usually focuses on examination rather than history. We aimed to ascertain the relative importance that trainee psychiatrists attach to the physical history and examination, and to investigate their actual method of physical assessment. The relative weight that trainees attach to physical history and examination was assessed with a postal questionnaire. Their actual practice was evaluated by reviewing a selection of case notes from patients under their care.

Results Trainees weighted the physical examination as more important than the history in theoretical terms (P=0.02). They also indicated that they attached more importance to examination in their own practice (P=0.03). On review of the case notes, 34 (71%) of inpatients had been physically examined, but only one (2%) had evidence of a physical history.

Clinical implications It appears that many psychiatric trainees do not adhere to the basic medical principle of taking a physical history on which to base a physical examination. ‘Blind’ examinations are unlikely to yield medical diagnoses. These findings have implications for our patients' health and psychiatric training.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
M. Phelan and G. Blair
Medical history-taking in psychiatry
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., May 1, 2008; 14(3): 229 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.