PB CPD Online e-learning site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2000) 24: 381-384. doi: 10.1192/pb.24.10.381
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whewell, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bonanno, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Whewell, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bonanno, D.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2000) 24: 381-384
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

The Care Programme Approach and risk assessment of borderline personality disorder

Clinical validation of the CORE risk sub-scale

Peter Whewell, Consultant Psychotherapist and Daria Bonanno, Psychologist in Clinical Training

Regional Department of Psychotherapy, Clarement House, off Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA

AIMS AND METHODS

This paper describes the validation of self-report of risk by patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) as compared with the judgement of experienced psychotherapists in regular contact with them. The aim was to validate the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation System (CORE) self-report in order to be able to use it to monitor risk change for patients with BPD in psychotherapy and general psychiatric settings.

RESULTS

There was significant separation correlation between CORE risk sub-scales for self-harm, suicide and risk to others and therapists' estimation of significant risk v. no significant risk.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Using the cut-offs described, we suggest that the CORE questionnaire risk sub-scales can be used to assess significant risk for patients with BPD in psychotherapy, and in psychiatric and community health teams. The sub-scales should also prove valuable in allocating Care Programme Approach status.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. Barkham, N. Gilbert, J. Connell, C. Marshall, and E. Twigg
Suitability and utility of the CORE-OM and CORE-A for assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings
The British Journal of Psychiatry, March 1, 2005; 186(3): 239 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
C. Mace
Implementing the care programme approach in psychotherapeutic settings
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., March 1, 2004; 10(2): 124 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.