PB Try Advances in Psychiatric Treatment Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2000) 24: 51-52. doi: 10.1192/pb.24.2.51
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, S.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2000) 24: 51-52
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Guardianship under the Mental Health Act 1983

Jenny Shaw, Senior Lecturer in Forensic Psychiatry

University of Manchester, Langdale Unit, Guild Park, Whittingham, Preston PR3 2JH

Barbara Hatfield, Director of Mental Health Social Work Research Unit and Sherrill Evans, Research Fellow

University of Manchester, Manchester

The study is being undertaken by the Institute of Psychiatry, University of Manchester School of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences and St George's Hospital Medical School, who received funding from the Department of Health.

AIMS AND METHOD

To describe the extent and variation in the use of Guardianship nationally. The Directors of Social Services were asked to provide details about Guardianship cases on two separate occasions one year apart.

RESULTS

There were 428 new Guardianship cases in 12 months. At the second enumeration, 73% of cases were within the mental illness category and 47% of these had serious mental illness.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

There is much variation in the use of Guardianship. Further developments of this study will explore the reasons for this variation and will ascertain clinicians' views on Guardianship, supervised discharge and other community treatment orders.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
S. Davies
Compulsory treatment in the community: current legal powers
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., May 1, 2002; 8(3): 180 - 188.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.