PB CPD Online e-learning site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2000) 24: 211-213. doi: 10.1192/pb.24.6.211
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foreman, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hanna, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Foreman, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hanna, M.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2000) 24: 211-213
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


How long can a waiting list be?

The impact of waiting time on intention to attend child and adolescent psychiatric clinics

D. M. Foreman, Consultant/Senior Lecturer in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Combined Healthcare NHS Trust and Keele University, The Barn, Main Road, Betley, Nr Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9AB

M. Hanna, Specialist Registrar in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Mersey Deanery

AIMS AND METHODS

Quantifying the relationship between waiting time and clinic attendance in child and adolescent psychiatry would allow better estimation of the resources needed to eliminate waiting lists in specific initiatives. All cases on a waiting list were sent a questionnaire, return of the questionnaire being necessary for an appointment to be made. Those who did not return the questionnaire or did not attend were contacted and a reason obtained whenever possible. The data were analysed using Cox regression.

RESULTS

Most who did not return their questionnaires had been waiting less than four weeks or longer than 30 weeks. Questionnaire return seemed a good estimate of intention to attend. Other factors improving questionnaire return were younger patient age, previous experience of the service, a clear common reason for referral, and a non-general practitioner referral source.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Waiting lists in child and adolescent psychiatry may have a natural `end-point at 30 weeks beyond which families give up, while waiting lists of less than one-month may be too short to lose transient problems. Failure to include this and other indicators of non-attendance may lead to overestimates of resources needed to remove queues for treatment. Questionnaires may be useful in identifying those intending to attend.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin Child Psychol PsychiatryHome page
J. McGarry, F. McNicholas, H. Buckley, B. D. Kelly, L. Atkin, and N. Ross
The Clinical Effectiveness of a Brief Consultation and Advisory Approach Compared to Treatment as Usual in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, July 1, 2008; 13(3): 365 - 376.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
D. S. J. Hawker
Increasing initial attendance at mental health out-patient clinics: opt-in systems and other interventions
Psychiatr. Bull., May 1, 2007; 31(5): 179 - 182.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.