|
|
|||||||||||
special articles |
University of Leeds
Bradford Assertive Outreach Team, 48 Ashgrove, Bradford BD7 1BL
Abstract
AIMS AND METHOD
Advocacy is assuming an increasingly important role in the delivery of mental health services, but many psychiatrists feel threatened by it. This study was performed to ascertain how much doctors and nurses know about advocacy and their attitudes towards it. We interviewed five senior house officers, five staff nurses and four community psychiatric nurses (CPNs) to examine their understanding, experience and opinions about advocacy. A full-time advocate was also interviewed to establish his views about how well staff understood his role.
RESULTS
In general there was poor understanding of the background and training of advocates, and their Code of Practice. There were also important differences in the way in which different groups of staff saw advocacy, with CPNs having the best understanding. Experiences of advocacy were positive and it was seen as being helpful both for clients and staff, despite fears that advocates might work to their own agendas.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
There is a need to improve psychiatrists' understanding of what advocacy is, through the involvement of advocates and service users in their training. This would help to allay their anxieties about the role of advocates.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Samuels, I. Hall, C. Parkes, and A. Hassiotis Professional staff and carers' views of an integrated mental health service for adults with learning disabilities Psychiatr. Bull., January 1, 2007; 31(1): 13 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Thomas Good Psychiatric Practice 2000. Council Report CR83: By Royal College of Psychiatrists Psychiatr. Bull., July 1, 2002; 26(7): 278 - 278. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |