|
|
|||||||||||
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School (Royal Free Campus), Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF
Department of Psychiatry, Royal Free Hospital, London
AIMS AND METHODS
Safety features of rooms used for clinical interviews were assessed throughout our mental health unit. Following this pilot survey, 12 safety standards were agreed and adopted by a multi-disciplinary audit meeting. Recommendations were disseminated throughout the trust.
Adherence to the accepted standards for interview room safety was assessed at 6 months and 1 year after baseline. Following each assessment, results were presented so that the audit cycle was completed twice.
RESULTS
At 6 months 46 interview rooms were assessed against the 12 accepted standards and many were found to be unsatisfactory. After presentation of these results, the 1 year assessment discovered few changes in safety features of the 50 rooms now being used.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Unsafe rooms compromise the safety of staff and patients and this is clearly unacceptable. The audit process in itself failed as a method of improving standards.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Rush, J. Reidy, B. Wright, F. Campbell, M. Ryan, G. Molyneux, A. Ambikapathy, and P. Leonard Safety at work: national survey of psychiatrists in basic training in Ireland Psychiatr. Bull., July 1, 2008; 32(7): 256 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Campbell and N. K. Fung How safe are patient interview rooms? Psychiatr. Bull., January 1, 2007; 31(1): 10 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Davison The management of violence in general psychiatry Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., September 1, 2005; 11(5): 362 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |