PB Handbook for Psychiatric Trainees
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 293-296. doi: 10.1192/pb.25.8.293
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haddock, A.W.
Right arrow Articles by Rees, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haddock, A.W.
Right arrow Articles by Rees, H.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 293-296
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Managing dangerous people with severe personality disorder

a survey of forensic psychiatrists' opinions{dagger}

A.W. Haddock, (MB, ChB, MRCPsych), Specialist Registrar in Forensic Psychiatry, P. R. Snowden, (MB, ChB, BSc, FRCPsych), Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist and M. Dolan, (MB, BAO, BCh, MRCPsych, MSc, PhD), Senior Lecturer and Honorary Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist

The Edenfield Centre, Prestwich Hospital, Bury New Road, Prestwich Hospital, Manchester M25 38L

J. Parker, (MB, ChB, MRCPsych), Specialist Registrar in Forensic Psychiatry and H. Rees, (MB, ChB, MRCPsych), Specialist Registrar in Psychiatry

Fromeside Clinic (MSU), Bristol

{dagger} See editorial, pp. 282-283, this issue.

AIMS AND METHOD

To canvass the opinions of psychiatrists working in forensic settings on the recent proposals relating to dangerous people with severe personality disorder (DSPD). Psychiatrists from secure settings were invited to a series of meetings. A questionnaire was circulated and the discussions recorded.

RESULTS

Opinion remains divided over diagnosis, treatability and assessment of risk in personality disorders. The medicalisation of DSPD to allow indeterminate detention in unconvicted cases is unacceptable to the majority (75%). There is no consensus on the Government proposals relating to DSPD. Only a minority (20%) of psychiatrists would work in a new specialist service, which has significant implications for service development.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The involvement of psychiatrists in preventative detention solely for public protection requires greater discussion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
T. Seddon
Dangerous liaisons: Personality disorder and the politics of risk
Punishment Society, July 1, 2008; 10(3): 301 - 317.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. T Tyrer
An agitation of contrary opinions
The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2007; 190(49): s1 - s2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Social PsychiatryHome page
P. Moran
Editorial: Dangerous Severe Personality Disorder Bad Tidings from the UK
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, March 1, 2002; 48(1): 6 - 10.
[PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
D. Chiswick
Dangerous severe personality disorder: from notion to law
Psychiatr. Bull., August 1, 2001; 25(8): 282 - 283.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.