|
|
|||||||||||
The Edenfield Centre, Prestwich Hospital, Bury New Road, Prestwich Hospital, Manchester M25 38L
Fromeside Clinic (MSU), Bristol
See editorial, pp. 282-283, this issue.
AIMS AND METHOD
To canvass the opinions of psychiatrists working in forensic settings on the recent proposals relating to dangerous people with severe personality disorder (DSPD). Psychiatrists from secure settings were invited to a series of meetings. A questionnaire was circulated and the discussions recorded.
RESULTS
Opinion remains divided over diagnosis, treatability and assessment of risk in personality disorders. The medicalisation of DSPD to allow indeterminate detention in unconvicted cases is unacceptable to the majority (75%). There is no consensus on the Government proposals relating to DSPD. Only a minority (20%) of psychiatrists would work in a new specialist service, which has significant implications for service development.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
The involvement of psychiatrists in preventative detention solely for public protection requires greater discussion.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Seddon Dangerous liaisons: Personality disorder and the politics of risk Punishment Society, July 1, 2008; 10(3): 301 - 317. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T Tyrer An agitation of contrary opinions The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2007; 190(49): s1 - s2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Moran Editorial: Dangerous Severe Personality Disorder Bad Tidings from the UK International Journal of Social Psychiatry, March 1, 2002; 48(1): 6 - 10. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chiswick Dangerous severe personality disorder: from notion to law Psychiatr. Bull., August 1, 2001; 25(8): 282 - 283. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |