PB Handbook for Psychiatric Trainees
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 310-313. doi: 10.1192/pb.25.8.310
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, J.
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, J.
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 310-313
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


special articles

Home or away

which patients are suitable for a psychiatric home treatment service?

Judy Harrison, Consultant Psychiatrist, Nooreen Alam, Medical Student and John Marshall, Home Options Manager

Department of Psychiatry, Central Manchester Healthcare NHS Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL

Abstract

AIMS AND METHOD

Home treatment offers an alternative to in-patient care, but little has been written about the practicalities of running such a service. Using routine information sources, details of referral and outcome are presented for patients assessed by a home treatment service over 6 months.

RESULTS

Forty-eight per cent of referrals were not accepted, mainly because of lack of cooperation, risk to self or others or the illness not being acute enough. Referrals from junior doctors and accident & emergency were least likely to be accepted. Seventy-two per cent of patients accepted suffered from schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder or depression with psychosis, similar to the diagnoses for in-patients. Twenty per cent of patients accepted had to be transferred to in-patient care later.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Staffing levels need to take account of time spent assessing patients. Junior doctors need training in how to use home treatment services appropriately and a wider range of options are needed to manage patients in crisis out of hours. It is possible to target patients with severe mental illness in a home treatment setting, but a significant number will need transfer to inpatient care.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
G. GLOVER, G. ARTS, and K. S. BABU
Crisis resolution/home treatment teams and psychiatric admission rates in England
The British Journal of Psychiatry, November 1, 2006; 189(5): 441 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
R. Tomar, N. Brimblecombe, and G. O'Sullivan
Service innovations: Home treatment for first-episode psychosis
Psychiatr. Bull., April 1, 2003; 27(4): 148 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.