|
|
|||||||||||
Leicester Frith Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QF
Harrow Learning Disability Team
University of Leicester
See editorial, pp. 283-284 this issue and pp. 302-304.
AIMS AND METHOD
A postal survey was sent to all consultants in the psychiatry of learning disability from four English regions. Their views on job satisfaction, their core roles and the management re-structuring of services were elicited.
RESULTS
The proportion agreeing or strongly agreeing with each management option was 79% for integrated mental healthlearning disability trusts, 61% for specialist learning disability trusts, 47% for care trusts, 10% for primary care trusts and 5% for social services. Only 34% felt consulted or able to influence the process of change and only 33% were satisfied with the current management changes within their trust but 67% were satisfied overall with their jobs.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Management from integrated mental healthlearning disability trusts is the most preferred option for psychiatrists in learning disability. A large number of consultants, though otherwise satisfied with their jobs, feel excluded or unable to influence the current changes in management structures. A model of integrated service provision in line with the government's learning disability strategy is presented.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Lindsey and A. Flynn A survey of consultants in the psychiatry of learning disability Psychiatr. Bull., September 1, 2003; 27(9): 342 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hollins What is the future of the psychiatry of learning disability? Psychiatr. Bull., August 1, 2002; 26(8): 283 - 284. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |