PB Mental Health Guidelines from NICE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2003) 27: 73-76. doi: 10.1192/pb.27.2.73
© 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, M.
Right arrow Articles by Galloway, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, M.
Right arrow Articles by Galloway, A.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2003) 27: 73-76
© 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


Education & training

Developing, delivering and evaluating interprofessional clinical risk training in mental health services

Mike Doyle, PhD Research Fellow

Bolton, Salford and Trafford Mental Health Partnership and Department of Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Harrop House, 535 Bury New Road, Prestwich, Manchester M25 3BL

Paul Earnshaw, Social Worker (Mental Health)

City of Salford Social Services

Adrian Galloway, Team Leader

Community Mental Health Team, Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust

Declaration of interest

None.

Abstract

AIMS AND METHOD

The need for training to prepare mental health professionals to assess and manage risks is now well established. This paper reports on the development, delivery and evaluation of interprofessional clinical risk training in Salford and Manchester since 1998. A training-needs analysis was carried out, followed by post-training evaluation and an impact-monitoring questionnaire.

RESULTS

The training was very well received by participants, with over 90% of them meeting the objectives and 100% of respondents reporting that the training had a positive impact on their clinical practice more than 12 months afterwards.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The evaluation of the training demonstrates that a properly planned and delivered 2-day clinical risk assessment course can have a positive impact on the practice of clinicians in mental health services. However, this should be seen only as an introductory course, as more advanced risk training is required. This is currently being delivered and planned.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.