PB CPD Online e-learning site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2003) 27: 251-253. doi: 10.1192/pb.27.7.251
© 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gavin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Grubin, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gavin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Grubin, D.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2003) 27: 251-253
© 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Reception screening and mental health needs assessment in a male remand prison

Noel Gavin, MB, BS, MRCPsych

Cherry Knowle Hospital, Sunderland

Shaun Parsons, C. Psychol, PhD, Lecturer in Clinical Psychology

University of Newcastle, Ridley Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU

Don Grubin, MD, MRCPsych, Professor of Forensic Psychiatry, Honorary Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist

University of Newcastle upon Tyne, St Nicholas Hospital, Jubilee Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE3 3XT

AIMS AND METHOD

This study was designed to clarify the nature and extent of psychiatric provision that would be needed if a new health screening protocol were to be introduced into the prison system. The reception screening questionnaires for every inmate coming into the prison over a 15-week period were reviewed using the new protocol. A further mental health assessment was undertaken on those who had screened positive.

RESULTS

201 men (32.6%) were found to be positive for serious mental illness

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Based on this analysis, large increases in psychiatric resources would not be needed if the proposed new reception health screening processes were in place, although a reorganisation of the way in which services are delivered may be required.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AssessmentHome page
J. D. Ford, R. L. Trestman, V. Wiesbrock, and Wanli Zhang
Development and Validation of a Brief Mental Health Screening Instrument for Newly Incarcerated Adults
Assessment, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 279 - 299.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
D. Duffy, S. Lenihan, and H. G. Kennedy
Screening prisoners for mental disorders
Psychiatr. Bull., July 1, 2003; 27(7): 241 - 242.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.