Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current
• Archive
• Feedback
• Subscribe
• Help

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Singh, S. P. Articles by Barnes, T. R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Singh, S. P. Articles by Barnes, T. R. E.

Developing early intervention services in the NHS: a survey to guide workforce and training needs

Department of Psychiatry, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE

Eileen Joyce, Professor of Neuropsychiatry and Hon. Consultant Psychiatrist and Thomas R. E. Barnes, Professor of Clinical Psychiatry and Hon. Consultant Psychiatrist

Department of Psychiatry, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RP

Declaration of interest

None.

AIMS AND METHOD

We conducted a questionnaire study to establish the incidence, specialist staff availability, treatment provision and socio-demographic profile of patients with first-episode psychosis referred to all adult and child and adolescent community mental health teams in south and west London.

RESULTS

All 39 teams completed the questionnaire, identifying 295 cases of first-episode psychosis (annual incidence 21/100 000/year) referred in the year 2000. Teams manage to engage most patients with first-episode psychosis. A total of 73% of cases of first-episode psychosis were on some form of Care Programme Approach. However, many teams did not have adequately trained staff to provide psychosocial interventions. Even where such staff were available, care was focused mainly on monitoring medication and risk assessment, with only half the teams providing psycho-educational programmes and only a quarter offering individual cognitive-behavioural therapy to those with first-episode psychosis.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Establishing early intervention services nationwide will require significant new resources, including specialist trained staff, which could prove difficult to provide in inner-city areas. Rather than a single, uniform service model, several models of early intervention services based on locally determined need might be more realistic and appropriate, and also allow research into their relative efficacy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. England, H. Lester, and M. Birchwood Collaborating to Provide Early-Intervention Services to Persons in England With First-Episode Psychosis Psychiatr Serv, November 1, 2009; 60(11): 1484 - 1488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. EL-Adl, J. Burke, and K. Little First-episode psychosis: primary care experience and implications for service development Psychiatr. Bull., May 1, 2009; 33(5): 165 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Singh and H. L. Fisher Early intervention in psychosis: obstacles and opportunities Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., January 1, 2005; 11(1): 71 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Rowlands The NICE schizophrenia guidelines: the challenge of implementation Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., November 1, 2004; 10(6): 403 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Holloway and K. Aitchison Early intervention in psychosis: from Government prescription to clinical practice Psychiatr. Bull., July 1, 2003; 27(7): 243 - 244. [Full Text] [PDF]