|
|
|||||||||||
Consultant Psychiatrist, Wolverhampton City Primary Care Trust and Professor of Mental Health & Ageing, University of Wolverhampton, Penn Hospital, Penn Road, Wolverhampton WV4 5HN. E-mail: susan.benbow{at}wiv.ac.uk
ECT Manager & Education and Training Coordinator, Edale Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary
AIMS AND METHOD
People receiving electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in one clinic completed side-effect rating questionnaires during treatment, and a questionnaire rating their experience of different aspects of treatment on completion of the treatment course.
RESULTS
Side-effects were commonly reported, but predominantly rated as mild or moderate. Most people reported that ECT had made them a little or a lot better, and that the treatment had been fairly or very well explained. Fewer than a fifth of respondents rated ECT as slightly or much worse than going to the dentist.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
We recommend routine monitoring of the subjective experience of ECT, during treatment and on completion of the course. Ratings should inform the treatment plan, the policies and procedures of the ECT clinic.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Rush, S. McCarron, and J. V. Lucey Patient attitudes to electroconvulsive therapy Psychiatr. Bull., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 212 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Mangaoang and J. V. Lucey Cognitive rehabilitation: assessment and treatment of persistent memory impairments following ECT Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., March 1, 2007; 13(2): 90 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Minerva BMJ, August 21, 2004; 329(7463): 468 - 468. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |