PB CPD Online e-learning site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2004) 28: 329-331. doi: 10.1192/pb.28.9.329
© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crossan, I.
Right arrow Articles by Ong, Y.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Crossan, I.
Right arrow Articles by Ong, Y.-L.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2004) 28: 329-331
© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Audit of psychiatric discharge summaries: completing the cycle

Isabelle Crossan, Specialist Registrar in Psychiatry

Newham Centre for Mental Health, Glen Road, London E13 8SP

David Curtis, Consultant and Honorary Professor in Adult Psychiatry

Royal London Hospital, London

Yong-Lok Ong, Consultant in Old Age Psychiatry

North East London Mental Health Trust, Ilford

AIMS AND METHOD

To examine and attempt to improve the recording of information within psychiatric discharge summaries in an adult psychiatry department, by means of audit and feedback. Psychiatric discharge summaries from an acute adult psychiatric department were examined to determine the recording of ten selected items. Following feedback and discussion, the audit was repeated after 6 months.

RESULTS

Fifty-one discharge summaries were examined on the first occasion and 53 on the second. There was considerable variability in the standard of recording across the selected items, but the patterns of recording were similar at both stages. No improvement was found in the recording of information at the second audit.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Audit and feedback alone may have little effect in changing clinical practice. This study examines the experience of undertaking clinical audit from a trainee’s perspective, illustrates barriers to change and highlights the possible limitations of audit as a clinical tool.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
C. G. Evans, C. d'Souza, P. Reynolds, C. Linton, L. Nukalapati, and A. Swarnkar
Audit of availability and awareness of guidelines for the management of confusion in older patients on general wards
Psychiatr. Bull., April 1, 2008; 32(4): 143 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.