PB Try Advances in Psychiatric Treatment Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 413-415. doi: 10.1192/pb.29.11.413
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ogunbamise, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lelliott, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ogunbamise, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lelliott, P.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 413-415
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Impact of a fast-track assessment clinic on waiting times and non-attendance rates for new referrals to a community mental health centre

Akinwande Ogunbamise, Clinical Observer, Marion Reardon, Clinical Audit Facilitator, Mo Mohoboob, Community Mental Health Team Manager and Paul Lelliott, Consultant Psychiatrist

Eltham Community Mental Health Centre, 4-8 Pound Place, Eltham, London SE9 5DN, e-mail: Paul.Lelliott{at}oxleas.nhs.uk

AIMS AND METHOD

A new fast-track assessment (FTA) clinic was established by a community mental health team (CHMT) in South-East London. Previously, those who responded to an opt-in letter were offered an appointment with a duty worker or at an out-patient clinic. In the new system, all routine referrals are booked into a single fortnightly clinic staffed by two doctors and two to three other CMHT staff with post-clinic discussion of all cases (2-6 min per case). A total of 100 consecutive referrals before the introduction of the FTA clinic were compared with 100 following the introduction.

RESULTS

The interval between receipt of referral to first appointment offered was reduced from 55 to 18 days and to actual assessment from 71 to 26 days. Eighty-four referrals to the FTA were offered a first appointment date that was within 21 days of receipt of a referral, compared with four before the introduction of the FTA. These differences were highly significant. There was a trend for more patients to attend for assessment after the FTA clinic was introduced (79 compared with 68).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This simple re-engineering of the assessment process within a CMHT has achieved its objective of reducing waiting times to first assessment appointment. It also appears to have reduced the number of referrals that do not result in an assessment.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, November 26, 2005; 331(7527): 1280 - 1280.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.