PB Handbook for Psychiatric Trainees
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 171-173. doi: 10.1192/pb.29.5.171
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hodgson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gayathri, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hodgson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gayathri, B.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 171-173
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

A survey of ward round practice

Richard Hodgson, Consultant Psychiatrist

Lyme Brook Mental Health Centre, Bradwell Hospital Site, Talke Road, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire ST5 7TL (e-mail: RichardE.Hodgson{at}nsch-tr.wmids.nhs.uk)

A. Jamal

Lyme Brook Mental Health Centre, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire

B. Gayathri

Harplands Hospital, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire

Declaration of interest

None.

AIMS AND METHOD

A postal questionnaire was sent to consultant psychiatrists in the West Midlands to establish their current ward round practice. This questionnaire addressed ward round etiquette, practical issues and educational function. Consultants received only one mailing.

RESULTS

A total of 96 (out of 139) consultants replied (69% response rate). The majority of consultants saw patients on the ward round (97%) and all consultants introduced both themselves and team members to the patient; 72% explained the purpose of the ward round. A median of seven professionals attended the ward round with psychology (6.5%) and pharmacy services (0%) being underrepresented. When consultants added comments, the recurrent themes were that ward rounds were an effective use of professional time but were often daunting for patients.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Our results indicate some uniformity in the conduct of ward rounds. The lack of representation at ward rounds for certain professional groups may adversely affect the range of opinions and therapies for patients. Changes could be made to incorporate the views of users, which would make ward rounds more productive for users and professionals.




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Ward rounds-for patients or for CMHTs??!!
Savitha Puttaiah
PB Online, 27 May 2005 [Full text]
Our Typical Ward Round
Dr Yasir Abbasi
PB Online, 27 May 2005 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.