PB CPD Online e-learning site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 298-301. doi: 10.1192/pb.29.8.298
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maidment, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by Thorn, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Maidment, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by Thorn, A.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 298-301
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

A medication error reporting scheme: analysis of the first 12 months

Ian D. Maidment, Chief Pharmacist

East Kent NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Trust Headquarters, St Martin’s Hospital, Littlebourne Road, Canterbury, Kent CT11AZ, tel: 01227 812115; fax: 01227 812296; e-mail: ian.maidment{at}nhs.net

Angie Thorn, Prescribing Support Pharmacy Technician

East Kent NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Canterbury

AIMS AND METHOD

A new medication error reporting scheme (‘Safemed’) was introduced within the East Kent NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust. All medication incidents reported using this system in the first year were analysed by the Chief Pharmacist.

RESULTS

Over a 12-month period a total of 66 incidents were reported through Safemed, compared with 55 incidents under the previous system. The low level of reporting made detailed statistical analysis and drawing meaningful conclusions problematic. There was a large variability in reporting between similar sites.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The low level of reporting was associated with cultural factors, in particular the failure to fully implement a ‘no blame’culture. Until such a culture is established, reporting will remain variable and a systems approach to preventing medication errors will not be adopted, leading to significant clinical risk.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
I. D Maidment, P. Lelliott, and C. Paton
Medication errors in mental healthcare: a systematic review
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2006; 15(6): 409 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.