PB Try Advances in Psychiatric Treatment Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 452-453. doi: 10.1192/pb.30.12.452
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferriter, K.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ferriter, K.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, J.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 452-453
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Quality of referrals to old age psychiatry following introduction of the single assessment process

Kathleen Ferriter, Associate Specialist, Partha Gangopadhyay, Senior House Officer, Ramin Nilforooshan, Senior House Officer and Mark Ardern, Consultant Psychiatrist

Central North West London Mental Health Trust

James Warner, Senior Lecturer in Old Age Psychiatry

Claybrook Centre, Charing Cross Campus, Imperial College, St Dunstan’s Road, London W6 8RP, email: j.warner{at}imperial.ac.uk

Declaration of interest

None.

AIMS AND METHOD

We sought to identify changes in the quality of information in referrals to an old age psychiatry service before and after the introduction of the single assessment process. Referrals were compared in terms of length, legibility, information and clinical utility.

RESULTS

Compared with letters before the introduction of the single assessment process, referrals made on the new forms took longer to read (mean 96 v. 124 s, P=0.001), had more illegible sections (P=0.011), contained less information (P=0.026) and were judged to be less clinically useful (P=0.001).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The introduction of the single assessment process has impaired clinical communication between general practitioners and psychiatrists, and might be prejudicial to patient care.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.