PB RCPsych Publications
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 210-212. doi: 10.1192/pb.30.6.210
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burns, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burns, T.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 210-212
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

NICE guidance in schizophrenia: how generalisable are drug trials?

Tom Burns, Professor of Social Psychiatry

University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, e-mail: tom.burns{at}psych.ox.ac.uk

THE UK SCHIZOPHRENIA CARE AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (SCAP)

Declaration of interest

The UK-SCAP study was funded by Eli Lilly and three members of the UK-SCAP group are employees of Eli Lilly.

AIMS AND METHOD

To test the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) assertion that characteristics of participants in the majority of clinical drug trials in schizophrenia do not reflect clinical practice. In particular they were concerned about the relative exclusion of women, older adults and patients with comorbidity. The baseline characteristics of a sample of 600 patients with schizophrenia recruited to be as representative as possible of UK community practice were compared with those from one of the largest international drug trials of an atypical antipsychotic.

RESULTS

Although comparisons could only be made on a limited range of characteristics the two samples were broadly comparable.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Current drug trials from pharmaceutical companies may have more relevance to clinical practice than their stated exclusion criteria may indicate.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
R. Hodgson, C. Bushe, and R. Hunter
Measurement of long-term outcomes in observational and randomised controlled trials
The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2007; 191(50): s78 - s84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.