PB CPD Online e-learning site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 303-305. doi: 10.1192/pb.30.8.303
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vijayakrishnan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Drummond, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vijayakrishnan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Drummond, L. M.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 303-305
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Service user involvement in training: the trainees' view

Ajay Vijayakrishnan, Senior House Officer

*Early Intervention Service, Fir Tower, Springfield University Hospital, 61 Glenburnie Road, London SW17 0RE, e-mail: avk999{at}gmail.com

Joan Rutherford, Consultant in Adult Psychiatry

Talworth Hospital, Surbiton KT6 7QU

Steve Miller, Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy

Springfield University Hospital, London SW17 7DJ

Lynne M. Drummond, Clinical Tutor

South-West London and St George's SHO Training Scheme, St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE

Declaration of interest

None.

AIMS AND METHOD

A questionnaire survey was conducted of trainees across the South-West London and St George's Basic Specialist Training Scheme in Psychiatry to explore their attitudes towards service user involvement in training.

RESULTS

Fifty-two completed questionnaires were received; 20 trainees (38%) had not attended teaching sessions where auser was present;35 trainees (67%) were agreeable to service user involvement in examinations. Reservations concerned the objectivity of service users in examination rating and their role as an expert on assessing the trainee's skill. Awareness of user involvement strategies and policies in their trusts were not matched with actual participation.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Service users should be involved in teaching in an expert capacity and also in examinations, with safeguards regarding transparency and objectivity of the marking schemes in place.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
K. S. Babu, R. Law-Min, T. Adlam, and V. Banks
Involving service users and carers in psychiatric education: what do trainees think?
Psychiatr. Bull., January 1, 2008; 32(1): 28 - 31.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
O. Haeney, R. Moholkar, N. Taylor, and T. Harrison
Service user involvement in psychiatric training: a practical perspective
Psychiatr. Bull., August 1, 2007; 31(8): 312 - 314.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Is there a need to evaluate users’ views as trainers?
MAHADEVAPRASAD JASTI, et al.
PB Online, 31 Aug 2006 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.