The Psychiatrist (2008) 32: 366-369. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.107.018309
© 2008 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data supplement
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nimmagadda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, C. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nimmagadda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, C. N.

Consultant psychiatrists’ knowledge of their role as representatives of the responsible authority at mental health review tribunals

Srikanth Nimmagadda, Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist

Cheswold Park Hospital, Cheswold Lane, Doncaster DN5 8AR, email: nskanth100{at}hotmail.com

Christopher N. Jones, Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist

Norvic Clinic, Norwich

Declaration of interest

C.J. is a medical member of the MHRT.

AIMS AND METHOD

A postal survey of consultant psychiatrists was carried out to assess their level of knowledge about the role of the person representing the responsible authority at a mental health review tribunal (MHRT).

RESULTS

Consultants generally had a low level of knowledge and understanding of their responsibilities as representatives, which increased since appointment and with experience of MHRTs. They thought it appropriate that they continue representing the detaining authority in most cases, but recognised training needs.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Postgraduate training and continuing professional development should address the competencies required for the representative role. Trusts should review their practice in respect of legal representation at MHRTs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The PsychiatristHome page
F. Bashir
Responsible medical officers and mental health review tribunals
The Psychiatrist, January 1, 2009; 33(1): 38 - 38.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The PsychiatristHome page
A. C. Gibson

The Psychiatrist, January 1, 2009; 33(1): 38 - 38.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The PsychiatristHome page
C. Montgomery

The Psychiatrist, January 1, 2009; 33(1): 38 - 39.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Representational role of RMO at MHRT hearings
Amar Shah
The Psychiatrist Online, 27 Oct 2008 [Full text]
Untitled
Tony S Zigmond
The Psychiatrist Online, 13 Oct 2008 [Full text]
DOCTORS AT TRIBUNALS
FAREED BASHIR
The Psychiatrist Online, 27 Oct 2008 [Full text]