HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data supplement Submit an eLetter View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Google Scholar Articles by Nimmagadda, S. Articles by Jones, C. N. PubMed Articles by Nimmagadda, S. Articles by Jones, C. N.

Consultant psychiatrists’ knowledge of their role as representatives of the responsible authority at mental health review tribunals

Cheswold Park Hospital, Cheswold Lane, Doncaster DN5 8AR, email: nskanth100{at}hotmail.com

Christopher N. Jones, Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist

Norvic Clinic, Norwich

Declaration of interest

C.J. is a medical member of the MHRT.

AIMS AND METHOD

A postal survey of consultant psychiatrists was carried out to assess their level of knowledge about the role of the person representing the responsible authority at a mental health review tribunal (MHRT).

RESULTS

Consultants generally had a low level of knowledge and understanding of their responsibilities as representatives, which increased since appointment and with experience of MHRTs. They thought it appropriate that they continue representing the detaining authority in most cases, but recognised training needs.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Postgraduate training and continuing professional development should address the competencies required for the representative role. Trusts should review their practice in respect of legal representation at MHRTs.

eLetters: