HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Dibben, C. Articles by Woodger, J. PubMed Articles by Dibben, C. Articles by Woodger, J.

Safety for psychiatrists - from trainee to consultant

^*West Suffolk Hospital, Hardwick Lane, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP33 2QZ, UK

Rory O’Shea, SpR Psychiatry

King’s Lynn Hospital, Norfolk

Ricci Chang, SHO Psychiatry

Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge

Joanna Woodger, SHO Psychiatry

Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge

Declaration of interest

None.

AIMS AND METHODS

To assess safe practice in psychiatry and self-perceptions of safety among trainees (Senior House Officers (SHOs) and Specialist Registrars (SpRs)) and consultants, a questionnaire was sent out to all general adult and old age psychiatrists, including trainees, in a teaching hospital and a district general hospital in East Anglia.

RESULTS

A total of 29 SHOs, 11 SpRs and 27 consultants were approached (response rate 92%). In the past year 69% SHOs, 45% SpRs and 11% consultants attended breakaway training. Interview rooms were frequently below the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ standards; 87% of the rooms did not have a panic button and 62% were isolated. Most doctors had felt threatened over the past 6 months but only 31% carried a personal alarm. Despite similar frequencies of assaults, consultants felt safer at work than trainees.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Safety is important for doctors throughout their careers and should be regularly reviewed by individuals as well as audited by hospital trusts.