Psychiatric Bulletin (2009) 33: 234-236. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.108.020479
© 2009 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawhney, I.
Right arrow Articles by Karki, C.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sawhney, I.
Right arrow Articles by Karki, C.

Education & training

Mental Capacity Act 2005: views and experiences of learning disability psychiatrists

Indermeet Sawhney, Consultant Psychiatrist

North East Essex PCT, Heath House, Colchester CO2 8GU, email:indermeet.sawhney{at}neessexpct.nhs.uk

Abir Mukhopadhyay, Specialist Registrar

North East Essex PCT, Colchester

Chuda Karki, Clinical Director

North East Essex PCT, Braintree, Essex

Declaration of interest

None.

Abstract

AIMS AND METHOD

Postal questionnaires were sent out to 66 learning disability psychiatrists to assess their knowledge and experience of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

RESULTS

A response rate of 55% (n = 36) was achieved; 22 (61%) respondents felt that patient care had improved; 16 (44%) felt workload had increased. Despite 79% (n = 23) of the respondents feeling that the training for the Act was adequate, only 19% (n = 7) were aware of the situations where patients had to be referred to the Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA) service and only 53% (n = 19) were aware that the Act currently does not cover patients who fall in the ‘Bournewood gap’.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Learning disability psychiatrists are still not conversant with significant parts of the Act and this raises questions about the adequacy of the training delivered. Implementing the Act should improve patient care but will have implications for the workload of professionals.