HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Paul, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Paul, M.

Consent of 16- and 17-year olds to admission and treatment

Parkview Clinic, 60 Queensbridge Road, Birmingham B13 8QE

Sir: Parkin (Psychiatric Bulletin, October 1999, 23, 587-589) is correct in stating that current guidance on consent to treatment as set out in the 1999 Code of Practice "remains potentially confusing and is inconsistent with good practice". Although the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA) has built into it greater protection for patients' rights regarding consent to treatment, if the child is not under a section of the MHA, the compulsory regulations of the MHA do not apply. For the child in the community or admitted ‘informally’, that is, not under the MHA, the new Code of Practice (Department of Health & Welsh Office, 1999) seems to be undermining the competent child's rights regarding consent to treatment. In doing so it is following the judicial paternalism of recent case law, which seems to subjugate one of the Code's guiding principles, that is, that people to whom the MHA applies should "be treated and cared for in such a way as to promote to the greatest practicable degree their self-determination and personal responsibility, consistent with their own needs and wishes", in favour of other ‘best interests’, which may be assumed to be a professional (whether judicial or medical) understanding of their physical or mental well-being. This makes the new Code internally inconsistent as well as "inconsistent with good practice". I echo Parkin's call to the Mental Health Act Commission to investigate such inconsistencies.

References

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & WELSH OFFICE (1999) Code of Practice to the Mental Health Act 1983 (Pursuant to Section 118 of the Act). London: The Stationary Office.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Russell Running an ECT department Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., January 1, 2001; 7(1): 57 - 64. [Full Text]

This Article Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Paul, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Paul, M.