PB E-mail content delivery - eTOCs !
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2000) 24: 393. doi: 10.1192/pb.24.10.393
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, R.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2000) 24: 393
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


Correspondence

The role of the psychiatric tsar

Richard Lucas

Consultant Psychiatrist, St Ann's Hospital, St Ann's Road, London N15 3TH

Sir: I wonder if other members of the College share my concern over the Government's introduction of a ‘psychiatric tsar’ even if the represenative, Louis Appleby, is a senior member of our College. The word tsar has unfortunate connotations, linked with past Russian dictators.

The concern is that, through the tsar, the Government will dictate national psychiatric practice. A recent newspaper article outlined the tsar's intention to make all acute wards single sex within the next 2 years; separating the sleeping quarters would not be sufficient (Brindle, 2000). Mind and the Schizophrenia Fellowship were reported to be enthusiastic for this measure. Yet we run a sector ward that has come under threat from such a measure, and both the Users' Group and Mind are strongly supportive of retaining the sector ward.

The Government wants to be seen to be introducing sweeping changes, but while these may look seductively good on paper, they may put at risk the very framework needed for our therapeutic work.

I am left wondering where the College comes into the situation. Should it be canvassing and representing its membership's views on the importance of maintaining sector wards? General psychiatrists are coming under increasing stress, reflected in difficulty in recruitment and early retirement. A firm stand by the College against imposition of too rigid national frameworks would be a first step towards improving the work climate for the beleaguered general psychiatrist.

References

BRINDLE, D. (2000) Mental Health Tsar's pledge to patients. The Guardian, 1 June.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
M. R. Lowe
In defence of inquiry panels
Psychiatr. Bull., October 1, 2003; 27(10): 395 - 395.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
D. Veasey and J. L. Cox
Further comments on inquiry panels
Psychiatr. Bull., October 1, 2000; 24(10): 393a - 394.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals