PB Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2000) 24: 395. doi: 10.1192/pb.24.10.395-a
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dale, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dale, M. C.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2000) 24: 395
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


Correspondence

Changes to the MRCPsych examinations

Mark C. Dale, Honorary Senior Lecturer and Consultant Old Age Psychiatrist

Fleetwood Hospital, Pharos Street, Fleetwood FY6 6BE

Sir: Although the forthcoming changes to the Part I and II MRCPsych Examinations are on the whole welcome news (Katona et al, 2000), I hold several reservations regarding some of the alterations proposed.

After several years of post-graduate experience in psychiatry I sat an Observed Structured Clinical Examination as part of the Licentiate of the Medical Council of Canada. I had concerns about the inherent validity of the psychiatric section of the examination, which at times was clearly role-play. By including actors in psychiatric examinations, are we not making unnecessary and unwelcome changes?

Experience in the long case is equally if not more valuable to those who fail as to those who pass the membership examinations, and I feel disappointed this will now be subject to screening procedures in Part II, particularly as it has been removed from Part I. Denying experience of a long case until Part II, and lessening the emphasis on history-taking, may delay development of those skills gained in preparing for this aspect of the examination, many of which are fundamental to good clinical practice.

Should changes to our examinations not be moving us closer to rather than further from ‘real world’ psychiatry?

References

KATONA, C., TYRER, S. P. & SMALLS, J. (2000) Changes to the MRCPsych examinations. Psychiatric Bulletin, 24, 276-278.[Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dale, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dale, M. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals