Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF
Directorate of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust
|
|
|---|
To improve liaison between local schools and child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) by exploring teachers' experiences and perceptions of CAMHS. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 25 volunteer primary school teachers.
RESULTS
Teachers reported exhausting education-based resources before seeking external advice. Most had positive experiences of child mental health services and were keen to be more involved. They favoured a service that provided rapid advice and ongoing support. Many complained about problems in communication.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Child psychiatrists should collaborate more effectively with teachers to promote mental health and manage children with behavioural and psychological problems.
|
|
|---|
As a significant influence on children's socio-emotional development (Maughan, 1994), schools are a logical point of intervention for child mental health professionals (Hendron et al, 1994). Even with increased resources, child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) alone are unlikely to be able to meet the needs of children with behavioural and psychological problems, leaving schools an important role in mental health promotion (Mental Health Foundation, 1999).
Developed from a project examining the impact of culture on parental attitudes towards children's mental health (Nikapota et al, 1998), this study aimed to improve our understanding of teachers' experience of CAMHS in order to improve collaboration. A third of our referrals were from schools, making us aware that local teachers felt increasingly overwhelmed by behavioural problems.
|
|
|---|
The interview covered the following areas:
We used open questions with prompts to ensure that all three areas were discussed, but (b) and (c) were also explored with vignettes chosen to illustrate common behaviours (see appendix 1).
Of 28 primary schools in the local education authority (LEA), 13 agreed to participate. Owing to cancellations (2) and time constraints (5), only 25/32 volunteers from 11 schools were interviewed. Head-teachers who gave a reason for declining to participate thought their staff were too overworked.
The framework model of quantitative data analysis (Ritchie & Spencer, 1994) uses intensive study of transcripts to define emerging themes and form a framework that is applied systematically to the raw data. This method was used to develop a coding manual for the parent survey (Nikapota et al, 1998) that we used to classify the teachers' responses. An independent rater reviewed five transcripts, with complete agreement on 60% of the responses.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 1. Comparison of the ethnic background of teachers who participated in the survey compared to the school population in the same borough at that time |
Attitudes towards children's emotions and behaviour
Social behaviour towards peers was the most cited area of functioning:
21/25 teachers mentioned aggression, 13/25 mixing with others and 11/25
caring/being helpful. This contrasts with the study on parents' attitudes
(Nikapota et al,
1998). Parents focused on social behaviour towards adults (214/220
discussed trust, no teachers mentioned it) and academic failure (216/220
parents cf. 2/25 teachers).
Teachers saw themselves as role models and used a combination of rewards and punishment within clearly defined rules to manage children's behaviour. Supervision (11/25 cf. none of the parents in the previous study) was considered more important in promoting good behaviour, while attending out-of-school clubs had a greater role in preventing naughtiness (16/25). They considered their own upbringing (23/25) and teaching experience (20/25) as important influences on their attitudes towards children, whereas few mentioned their training (12/25) or the social environment in which they worked (4/25) (see Table 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 2. Teachers' responses to the open questions |
The most common barrier to managing children with behavioural disorders was problematic relationships with parents: 17/25 reported lack of support from parents and 11/25 poor parenting.
Attitudes towards child and adolescent mental health services
Of 20 teachers who had experience of CAMHS, four thought CAMHS had not
helped. There were spontaneous complaints about slow response (9/25) and poor
communication (13/25). One teacher described an occasion where both she and a
mental health worker had suggested that a child record his feelings in a book,
resulting in the child and family feeling unsure what should be written in
each book.
Response to the vignettes
Most teachers thought children required help, but not necessarily from
professionals. If external agencies were suggested, teachers varied their
recommendations with the behaviour displayed, for instance, the child running
away prompted referrals to social services (10), whereas bed-wetting was seen
as the parents' (19) or the general practitioners' (15) responsibility. The
most common response involved discussions with the child and their parents,
but class discussions were used to deal with general issues such as bullying
and fighting (see Table 3).
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 3. Teachers' responses to the vignettes |
|
|
|---|
A study asking parents, teachers and children to rank pro- and antisocial behaviours found no significant differences between teachers and parents (Warden et al, 1996). In our study, divergent attitudes may have stemmed from cultural differences. In our sample 68% were White, but in this LEA Caucasians represent 47% of the school population. Whatever their origin, this difference in attitude may complicate relationships between parents and teachers (and other professionals) who need to remain sensitive. Few teachers' attitudes were influenced by training or socio-demographic factors, although their comments suggested that teaching in these areas would be welcomed.
A similar survey of secondary schools found that 39% of teachers were aware of CAMHS (Kurtz et al, 1995). We found a much higher (80%) level of awareness, which may relate to recent organisational changes in LEA services that had left teachers feeling unsupported, or to the (unusual) lack of a waiting list for our service. The relation of service structure to awareness of, and referrals to, CAMHS could be investigated by studying other LEAs.
Teachers' attitudes towards CAMHS are salutary. Even those with positive experiences complained of slow responses and poor communication. Our findings suggest that despite high levels of awareness of CAMHS, teachers contained the majority of problems within the school, referring only children with persistent and severe difficulties. A survey of secondary and nursery schools also found that teachers utilise education-based services before referring to CAMHS (Kurtz et al, 1995). Frustration at services that are slow to respond and fail to communicate is understandable.
As children spend a large proportion of their time at school, teachers could be involved in mental health promotion and reinforcing treatment strategies, in addition to being informants. Many children with behavioural disorders never reach mental health specialists (Offord et al, 1987), and recent studies suggest that many are managed in non-psychiatric settings, especially education services (Burns et al, 1995; Leaf et al, 1996; Gwendolyn et al, 1997). Although many clinicians routinely contact schools, issues of confidentiality arise if teachers become more actively involved, and the profession needs to consider how to balance this conflict. Resources are being wasted, as is suggested by the example mentioned above of professionals using the same strategy but undermining its effectiveness by acting in parallel. At a more severe level, Oliver's (1988) paper on successive generations of child maltreatment identifies poor collaboration as a major stumbling block to child protection, with fragments of information held by different agencies contributing to the failure to prevent some children from abuse.
The White Paper, Excellence in Schools, emphasised the need for behavioural support (for a summary see Department Education and Employment, 1997). The NHS Health Advisory Service report, Together We Stand (1995), recommends a tiered approach to CAMHS. The service should support primary care workers, social services, independent clinicians and schools in the management of the majority of children with behavioural disorders, and see only those with severe disorders. The World Health Organization (Hendren et al, 1989) proposed a similar model for schools; mental health promotion could be integrated into the school curriculum, secondary prevention would target pupils at high risk while children with psychiatric disorders would be referred to CAMHS.
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Vignette 1
A nine-year-old girl fights a great deal in school. She is tough and does
not allow anyone to bully her or to make any remark to her.
Vignette 2
A nine-year-old boy has always got a smile on his face. He doesn't play or
mix with other children and he doesn't do his work as well as he could.
Vignette 3
A nine-year-old girl is still wetting the bed. Her father's job has led to
the family moving house five times.
Vignette 4
The parents of a ten-year-old boy complain that he is regularly stealing
money from them. It appears to be spent on sweets for him and other
children.
Vignette 5
A nine-year-old boy who is good at home and at school has stomach aches
every morning and starts missing a lot of school.
Vignette 6
A ten-year-old girl has run away from home on four occasions. Six months
ago her parents discovered that she started smoking.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Gowers, S. Thomas, and S. Deeley Can Primary Schools Contribute Effectively to Tier I Child Mental Health Services? Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, July 1, 2004; 9(3): 419 - 425. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||