PB CPD Online e-learning site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2000) 24: 54-56. doi: 10.1192/pb.24.2.54
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greengross, P.
Right arrow Articles by Stanton, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Greengross, P.
Right arrow Articles by Stanton, R.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2000) 24: 54-56
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Pressure on adult acute psychiatric beds. Results of a national questionnaire survey

Peter Greengross, Senior Registrar in Public Health Medicine

Department of Public Health & Health Policy, Brent & Harrow Health Authority

Doris Hollander, Honorary Senior Lecturer

Institute of Psychiatry, PO Box LB1473, London W1A 9LB

Richard Stanton, Consultant Psychiatrist

Bath Mental Healthcare NHS Trust


   Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods and analysis
 Findings
 Discussion
 References
 
AIMS AND METHOD

To quantify perceived problems with psychiatric bed availability nationally using a questionnaire survey of all 210 UK mental health trusts.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-three (82%) trusts replied. Thirty (17%) are often over-occupied, 21 (15%) often have problems with bed availability. Ten (7%) often use extra-contractual referrals (ECRs). Frequent over-occupancy is associated with deprivation. Frequent use of ECRs is associated with relatively few beds.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Problems with bed availability are found nationwide, but outside southern England are relatively infrequent. Such problems are less pronounced than in Greater London.


   Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods and analysis
 Findings
 Discussion
 References
 
Numerous reports have highlighted the pressures on acute adult psychiatric beds, both in London (Powell et al, 1995; Johnson et al, 1997) and nationally (Shepherd et al, 1997). These have demonstrated associations between occupancy, deprivation and number of beds. In contrast, there has been no comprehensive national survey to determine the frequency and geographical spread, rather than the severity and causes, of such problems outside London.


   Methods and analysis
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods and analysis
 Findings
 Discussion
 References
 
Between November 1996 and May 1997, the chief executive of every NHS trust providing in-patient adult psychiatric services in the UK was sent an open-ended questionnaire requesting information on:

  1. the size of their catchment area population;
  2. the number of acute adult psychiatric beds (excluding specialist beds, for example those for eating disorders, puerperal disorders and intensive care);
  3. the frequency of problems with bed availability and over-occupancy;
  4. how often the trust used extra-contractual referrals (ECRs).

Trusts within Greater London were excluded. Nonresponders were followed up with two repeat mailings and telephone calls.

Responses were assessed and graded into three groups (rarely, sometimes and often) independently by D. H. and R. S. (see table footnote). The responses were rated as follows: rarely includes never, rarely, and very rarely; sometimes includes occasionally and sometimes; often includes often, frequently and continuously.

Trusts were grouped by country, region and health authority within which they were located, by Office for National Statistics area classification and by level of deprivation (Jarman UPA-8 score <1, 1-25, >25) for the host health authority, and by the number of beds per thousand population (<0.22, 0.22-0.42, >0.42). {chi}2-tests of significance were calculated to assess differences between groups of trusts and are presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.


   Findings
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods and analysis
 Findings
 Discussion
 References
 
One hundred and seventy-three (82%) of the 210 acute adult mental health trusts outside Greater London replied (64% Northern Ireland, 80% Scotland, 81% Wales, 84% England). Fifty-three (31%) trusts were rarely or never over-occupied, while 30 (17%) often had such problems. The findings for bed availability are similar. Eleven trusts frequently use ECRs, all except one were in England (see Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Results of survey
 

No Scottish trust reported using ECRs, and problems were relatively infrequent in Wales and Northern Ireland. Over-occupancy occurs more often in English trusts (19% v. 11%) as does the use of ECRs (43% v. 23%) but the differences are only significant for Scottish trusts.

Trusts which often use ECRs were significantly more likely to have fewer than 0.22 beds per thousand population than others (odds ratio 5.8; 95% Cl 1.3-35.0). Those in England are significantly more likely to be located in one of the four southern regions (ever use ECRs: odds ratio 2.62; 95% Cl 1.24-5.57; often use ECRs: odds ratio 5.66; 1.06-56.14). There is no similar association for bed availability or over-occupancy.

Trusts reporting frequent problems with over-occupancy were significantly more likely to be situated in health authorities with Jarman scores above 25 (odds ratio 8.1; 1.7-41.8). There is no relationship between ECR use and deprivation, nor between any of the measures and area classification.

Five of the seven trusts reporting both frequent use of ECRs and frequent problems with bed availability were in one of the four most southerly English regions and none were outside England.

There is a significant correlation between bed density and the deprivation score (r=0.337, P=0.001).


   Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods and analysis
 Findings
 Discussion
 References
 
This survey was undertaken to quantify problems with bed availability nationally and to compare those previously reported for London. Hirsch et al (1998) have defined ideal bed occupancy as 85%, allowing a margin for the unexpected. However, Lelliott et al (further details available from author upon request) reported levels up to 130%; so this study started from the premise that, in practice, bed occupancy up to 100% did not constitute over-occupancy.

The methods used differ from previous studies in particular by using open-ended questions. However, despite the possibility of response bias (which could be expected to exaggerate the extent of problems) this simple approach was adopted to obtain a rapid overview of the situation and is justified by the high response rate.

We did not observe associations between bed occupancy or use of ECRs and the type of area served by the trust. This may be because the Office for National Statistics classifications used relate to the host health authority, which is not necessarily the same as the catchment area served by the trust. However, as reported previously (Jarman et al, 1992; Powell et al, 1995; Shepherd et al, 1997), we noted relationships with deprivation and bed density. We therefore believe the findings are valid.

English trusts (particularly in southern regions) experience greater pressure on beds and consequently use ECRs more often than elsewhere. However, compared with reported mean four-year bed occupancy figures for London trusts of 98% (Powell et al, 1995), and subsequent increases (Hollander et al, 1996), problems appear considerably less severe nationally than in the capital.

Nonetheless, we did observe frequent problems with bed availability in individual cities and trusts, suggesting the need for more detailed study using, for example, bed census models. In addition, certain rural areas face surprisingly frequent pressures on beds. The question raised is whether the development of community-based crisis teams, day hospital places and assertive outreach teams, as proposed by the government, will reduce these pressures. Certainly, these preliminary findings would not support further bed reductions in the absence of a greatly improved community infrastructure.


   Acknowledgments
 
We would like to thank the chief executives of all the trusts for their help and cooperation; Carmel Cadden for secretarial assistance and Amani Syam for statistical advice.


   References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods and analysis
 Findings
 Discussion
 References
 
HIRSCH, S. R., GERRARD, B., MALIN, H., et al (1988) Psychiatric Beds and Resources: Factors Influencing Bed Use and Service Planning. Report of a Working Party of the Section for Social and Community Psychiatry of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. London: Gaskell.

HOLLANDER, D., POWELL, R. & TOBIANSKY, R. (1996) Bed occupancy in psychiatric units in Greater London is 113%. British Medical Journal, 313, 166.[Free Full Text]

JARMAN, B., HIRSCH, S., WHITE, P., et al (1992) Predicting psychiatric admission rates. British Medical Journal, 304, 1146-1151.

JOHNSON, S., RAMSAY, R., THORNICROFT, G., et al (1997) London's Mental Health. The Report to the King's Fund London Commission. London: King's Fund.

POWELL, R. B., HOLLANDER, D. & TOBIANSKY, R. I. (1995) Crisis in admission beds. A four-year survey of the bed state of Greater London's acute psychiatric units. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 765-769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SHEPHERD, G., BEADSMOORE, A., MOORE, C., et al (1997) Relation between bed use, social deprivation and overall bed availability in acute adult psychiatric units, and alternative residential options: a cross sectional survey, one day census data, and staff interviews. British Medical Journal, 314, 262-266.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
J. Glasby and H. Lester
On the Inside: A Narrative Review of Mental Health Inpatient Services
Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2005; 35(6): 863 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
G. Inglis and M. Baggaley
Triage in mental health - a new model for acute in-patient psychiatry
Psychiatr. Bull., July 1, 2005; 29(7): 255 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
M. G. Smyth
Crisis resolution/home treatment and in-patient care
Psychiatr. Bull., February 1, 2003; 27(2): 44 - 47.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
H. Griffiths
Acute wards: problems and solutions: Their fall and rise
Psychiatr. Bull., November 1, 2002; 26(11): 428 - 430.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greengross, P.
Right arrow Articles by Stanton, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Greengross, P.
Right arrow Articles by Stanton, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals