|
|
|||||||||||
Department of Public Health & Health Policy, Brent & Harrow Health Authority
Institute of Psychiatry, PO Box LB1473, London W1A 9LB
Bath Mental Healthcare NHS Trust
|
|
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To quantify perceived problems with psychiatric bed availability nationally using a questionnaire survey of all 210 UK mental health trusts.
RESULTS
One hundred and seventy-three (82%) trusts replied. Thirty (17%) are often over-occupied, 21 (15%) often have problems with bed availability. Ten (7%) often use extra-contractual referrals (ECRs). Frequent over-occupancy is associated with deprivation. Frequent use of ECRs is associated with relatively few beds.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Problems with bed availability are found nationwide, but outside southern England are relatively infrequent. Such problems are less pronounced than in Greater London.
|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Methods and analysis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Trusts within Greater London were excluded. Nonresponders were followed up with two repeat mailings and telephone calls.
Responses were assessed and graded into three groups (rarely, sometimes and often) independently by D. H. and R. S. (see table footnote). The responses were rated as follows: rarely includes never, rarely, and very rarely; sometimes includes occasionally and sometimes; often includes often, frequently and continuously.
Trusts were grouped by country, region and health authority within which
they were located, by Office for National Statistics area classification and
by level of deprivation (Jarman UPA-8 score <1, 1-25, >25) for the host
health authority, and by the number of beds per thousand population (<0.22,
0.22-0.42, >0.42).
2-tests of significance were calculated
to assess differences between groups of trusts and are presented as odds
ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
|
|
Findings |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
No Scottish trust reported using ECRs, and problems were relatively infrequent in Wales and Northern Ireland. Over-occupancy occurs more often in English trusts (19% v. 11%) as does the use of ECRs (43% v. 23%) but the differences are only significant for Scottish trusts.
Trusts which often use ECRs were significantly more likely to have fewer than 0.22 beds per thousand population than others (odds ratio 5.8; 95% Cl 1.3-35.0). Those in England are significantly more likely to be located in one of the four southern regions (ever use ECRs: odds ratio 2.62; 95% Cl 1.24-5.57; often use ECRs: odds ratio 5.66; 1.06-56.14). There is no similar association for bed availability or over-occupancy.
Trusts reporting frequent problems with over-occupancy were significantly more likely to be situated in health authorities with Jarman scores above 25 (odds ratio 8.1; 1.7-41.8). There is no relationship between ECR use and deprivation, nor between any of the measures and area classification.
Five of the seven trusts reporting both frequent use of ECRs and frequent problems with bed availability were in one of the four most southerly English regions and none were outside England.
There is a significant correlation between bed density and the deprivation score (r=0.337, P=0.001).
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The methods used differ from previous studies in particular by using open-ended questions. However, despite the possibility of response bias (which could be expected to exaggerate the extent of problems) this simple approach was adopted to obtain a rapid overview of the situation and is justified by the high response rate.
We did not observe associations between bed occupancy or use of ECRs and the type of area served by the trust. This may be because the Office for National Statistics classifications used relate to the host health authority, which is not necessarily the same as the catchment area served by the trust. However, as reported previously (Jarman et al, 1992; Powell et al, 1995; Shepherd et al, 1997), we noted relationships with deprivation and bed density. We therefore believe the findings are valid.
English trusts (particularly in southern regions) experience greater pressure on beds and consequently use ECRs more often than elsewhere. However, compared with reported mean four-year bed occupancy figures for London trusts of 98% (Powell et al, 1995), and subsequent increases (Hollander et al, 1996), problems appear considerably less severe nationally than in the capital.
Nonetheless, we did observe frequent problems with bed availability in individual cities and trusts, suggesting the need for more detailed study using, for example, bed census models. In addition, certain rural areas face surprisingly frequent pressures on beds. The question raised is whether the development of community-based crisis teams, day hospital places and assertive outreach teams, as proposed by the government, will reduce these pressures. Certainly, these preliminary findings would not support further bed reductions in the absence of a greatly improved community infrastructure.
|
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HOLLANDER, D., POWELL, R. & TOBIANSKY, R. (1996)
Bed occupancy in psychiatric units in Greater London is 113%.
British Medical Journal,
313, 166.
JARMAN, B., HIRSCH, S., WHITE, P., et al (1992) Predicting psychiatric admission rates. British Medical Journal, 304, 1146-1151.
JOHNSON, S., RAMSAY, R., THORNICROFT, G., et al (1997) London's Mental Health. The Report to the King's Fund London Commission. London: King's Fund.
POWELL, R. B., HOLLANDER, D. & TOBIANSKY, R. I.
(1995) Crisis in admission beds. A four-year survey of the bed
state of Greater London's acute psychiatric units. British Journal
of Psychiatry, 167,
765-769.
SHEPHERD, G., BEADSMOORE, A., MOORE, C., et al
(1997) Relation between bed use, social deprivation and overall
bed availability in acute adult psychiatric units, and alternative residential
options: a cross sectional survey, one day census data, and staff interviews.
British Medical Journal,
314,
262-266.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Glasby and H. Lester On the Inside: A Narrative Review of Mental Health Inpatient Services Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2005; 35(6): 863 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Inglis and M. Baggaley Triage in mental health - a new model for acute in-patient psychiatry Psychiatr. Bull., July 1, 2005; 29(7): 255 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Smyth Crisis resolution/home treatment and in-patient care Psychiatr. Bull., February 1, 2003; 27(2): 44 - 47. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Griffiths Acute wards: problems and solutions: Their fall and rise Psychiatr. Bull., November 1, 2002; 26(11): 428 - 430. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |