|
|
|||||||||||
Waterlow Unit, Highgate Hill, London
32 Drayton Park, London N5 1PB
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, London
|
|
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To describe Drayton Park, the first women-only residential mental health crisis facility in the UK and to investigate whether it is succeeding in its remit of providing a viable alternative to hospital admission. We randomly selected case files from 100 women admitted to Drayton Park since its opening and examined variables including demographic details, the reasons for referral, diagnosis and the source of referral.
RESULTS
Our findings show that the service is able to respond quickly to referrals and appears to be functioning safely. The women admitted have a relatively short length of stay, half suffer from depressive episodes and one-third have a relapse of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
This project appears to be succeeding in providing a safe alternative to hospital admission for women with severe and enduring mental health problems.
|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The planning of Drayton Park has taken into account two areas of need highlighted as important in the development of mental health services. Some authors have recommended that supported residential facilities should be developed in the community for patients in acute crisis, providing an alternative to in-patient hospital admission (Davis et al, 1994). This may be less personally and socially dislocating for some people with serious mental illness and it may also be of particular value in the inner city where psychiatric morbidity is high, bed occupancy excessive and dissatisfaction with conditions on acute wards is increasing (MilMIS, 1995). There is some evidence from the USA that the crisis house model can be successful (Bedell & Ward, 1989; Fenton et al, 1998) and although the idea has received support from user groups (Sayce et al, 1995) the development and evaluation of such services in the UK has been limited.
There has been recent recognition that women in acute mental distress may be poorly served by existing mental health facilities where there is a lack of privacy, assaults are common and the atmosphere highly aroused (MilMIS, 1995). Female patients' vulnerability to sexual harassment and assault has been highlighted by Henderson & Reveley (1996) and by Mind's Stress on Women campaign (Sayce, 1996). Admission to mixed wards is particularly appropriate for women from some ethnic or religious backgrounds where segregated living is prescribed. Many women admitted to psychiatric wards have experienced childhood sexual abuse or domestic violence and their vulnerability on the ward is especially worrying.
For women with children acute admission to the psychiatric ward means that alternative child care arrangements have to be made, often at short notice and sometimes involving placement of the children in the care of social services. For these reasons the idea of a women-only crisis unit which could provide a safe place for those who would otherwise require hospital admission and which could provide facilities so that children remain with their mothers was developed.
|
|
History |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Description |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Drayton Park is able to accommodate up to four children over six months in age with a maximum of two children per woman. Child care remains the responsibility of the woman, but up to three two-hour crèche sessions per week are provided to enable attendance at group or individual sessions. Social services children and families teams are informed when any child stays at Drayton Park.
Referrals are taken by telephone from the women themselves, GPs, mental health professionals and carers. Following referral a decision is made as to whether to proceed to assessment and this takes place at Drayton Park and is carried out by a project worker. At assessment there is a thorough exploration of the current situation, the woman's mental state and her level of risk. Women who are considered to be at current risk of violent behaviour, who are misusing drugs or alcohol such that they require detoxification under medical supervision or who are unable to engage in a safety plan and therefore need constant supervision are not offered a place. On admission every woman is allocated two named workers with whom she will plan her care within the framework of the Care Programme Approach. Some women are already known to mental health services and will have community-based keyworkers who remain involved with their care. If women are new to the service then a decision is made as to whether a community-based keyworker needs to be allocated, in which case a referral is made to the sector community mental health team.
The women admitted to the project are temporarily registered at a local general practice which provides a 24-hour medical cover, and a sessional GP visits the project three times a week to see women at the staff's request. Any change in medication can be discussed with the women's own GP or psychiatrist and psychiatric advice and assessment is provided by the women's own sector community mental health team if required. The project has a target of a maximum stay of 28 days. The work done at the house is focused on identifying and resolving the triggers to crisis using a systemic approach based on the model used in family therapy. A variety of interventions are used, involving group and individual work, medication and various complementary therapies including homeopathy, acupuncture and massage. Particular efforts are made to maintain supportive community links where they exist and to identify and strengthen the woman's own coping strategies. Throughout their stay women are encouraged to take an active part in resolving their situation including self-medication as soon as possible. The ethos of the project is to reduce unnecessary reliance on staff.
|
|
The study |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Findings |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In our sample population we found that referrals came from a wide variety of sources and the majority of assessments took place within 24 hours (see Table 1). The ethnic breakdown is given in Table 2. The mean age was 39 years (range 20-72, median 37). The average length of stay was 19 days (range 1-50) and 19 women were given extensions beyond the four week target. The most common reason for admission was suicidal ideation and/or self-harm (47%) followed by relapse of psychosis (23%). The most common diagnosis was depression (53%) followed by schizophrenia (16%) and bipolar disorder (15%). Further details are given in Table 3. Six women were recorded as misusing alcohol or drugs in addition to their primary diagnosis. Eighty per cent of the women were previously known to psychiatric services and 78% had at least one previous admission to a psychiatric unit. Sixty-five women saw a doctor during their admission and of these 10 (15%) saw their sector doctor, 50 (77%) saw the house GP, four (6%) saw their own GP and one (2%) saw a doctor in casualty.
|
|
|
|
|
Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Drayton Park has succeeded in its aim of providing safe alternative to hospital admission for those who experience acute mental distress and admits women with severe mental health problems. The involvement of service users in the planning and management advisory group has helped the project to incorporate an alternative approach to crisis resolution and its innovative style has aroused both national and international interest. Future evaluation of this service including the unique facility it offers to women with children is planned.
|
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DAVIES, S., PRESILLA, B., STRATHDEE, G., et al (1994) Community beds: the future for mental health care? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 29, 241-243.[CrossRef][Medline]
FENTON, W., MOSHER, L., HERRELL, J., et al
(1998) Randomized trial of general hospital and residential
alternative care for patients with severe and persistent mental illness.
American Journal of Psychiatry,
155,
516-522.
HENDERSON, C. & REVELEY, A. (1996) Is there a case
for single sex wards? Psychiatric Bulletin,
20,
513-515.
MILMIS PROJECTS GROUP (1995) Monitoring inner London
mental illness services. Psychiatric Bulletin,
19,
276-280.
SAYCE, L., CHRISTIE, Y., SLADE, M., et al (1995) Users' perspective on emergency needs. In Emergency Mental Health Services in the Community (eds M. Phelan, G. Strathdee & G. Thornicroft). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SAYCE, L., (1996) Campaigning for women. In Planning Community Mental Health Services for Women (eds K. Abel, M. Buszewicz, S. Davison, et al) Routledge: London.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Johnson, H. Gilburt, B. Lloyd-Evans, and M. Slade Acute in-patient psychiatry: residential alternatives to hospital admission Psychiatr. Bull., July 1, 2007; 31(7): 262 - 264. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Meiser-Stedman, L. Howard, and P. Cutting Evaluating the effectiveness of a women's crisis house: a prospective observational study Psychiatr. Bull., September 1, 2006; 30(9): 324 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gould, K. Theodore, S. Pilling, P. Bebbington, M. Hinton, and S. Johnson Initial treatment phase in early psychosis: can intensive home treatment prevent admission? Psychiatr. Bull., July 1, 2006; 30(7): 243 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Glasby and H. Lester On the Inside: A Narrative Review of Mental Health Inpatient Services Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2005; 35(6): 863 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Thornicroft and M. Tansella Components of a modern mental health service: a pragmatic balance of community and hospital care: Overview of systematic evidence The British Journal of Psychiatry, October 1, 2004; 185(4): 283 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kohen Psychiatric services for women Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., September 1, 2001; 7(5): 328 - 334. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Howard Psychotic disorders and parenting -- the relevance of patients' children for general adult psychiatric services Psychiatr. Bull., September 1, 2000; 24(9): 324 - 326. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |