|
|
|||||||||||
University of Birmingham, Lyndon Resource Centre, Hobs Meadow, Solihull, West Midlands B92 8PW
Pharmacy Department, Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust, The Wells Road Centre, Nottingham NG3 3AA
Lyndon Resource Centre, Solihull, West Midlands B92 8PW
|
|
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A postal questionnaire was used to compare the pharmacological management of alcohol withdrawal as carried out by a group of general practitioners and specialist alcohol services.
RESULTS
General practitioners were significantly more likely to prescribe chlormethiazole, less likely to use B vitamins and less likely to admit patients with a history of withdrawal complications.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
General practitioners need training in order to improve their management of alcohol withdrawal.
|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The study |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The questionnaire was sent to randomly selected GPs in Nottingham (n=147) and all SAS (n=47) as listed in the Alcohol Services Directory. Replies were received from 74 GPs and 32 SAS, response rates of 50.3% and 86% respectively.
Data were analysed using the
2 and Mann-Whitney
U-tests.
|
|
Findings |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2=5.520, Yates correction 4.172, d.f.=1,
P<0.05). Of those practitioners who used benzodiazepines, the initial mean daily dose (in chlordiazepoxide equivalents) used by GPs and SAS were 45.8 mg and 98.1 mg respectively. The dose used by GPs was significantly less than that used by SAS (Mann-Whitney U-test U=136, P<0.001).
Both GPs and SAS used sedatives for an average of nine days.
B vitamins
Only 64% of GPs (n=47) prescribed oral vitamins, compared with 88%
of SAS (n=28). GPs were therefore significantly less likely to use
such treatment (
2=5.825, d.f.=1, P<0.05).
The mean daily dose of thiamine prescribed by GPs (16.5 mg) was significantly (Mann-Whitney U-test U=720, Z=-3.2297, P<0.001) less than that prescribed by SAS (77.6 mg).
The mean treatment duration with vitamins for GPs and SAS was 36.2 and 21.5 days respectively, and did not vary significantly between the two groups.
A comparison of the indications for the use of oral vitamins as perceived by GPs and SAS are summarised in Table 1. None of these results demonstrated a significant difference between the two groups of practitioners.
|
Parenteral thiamine was prescribed by 11% GPs (n=16) and 13% SAS (n=4). These findings were not significantly different.
Indications for admission
These results are summarised in Table
2. GPs were significantly less likely than SAS to consider a
history of withdrawal complications (
2 9.376, Yates correction
7.855 d.f.=1, P<0.01) as a valid indication for admission.
|
|
|
Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GPs were significantly less likely to use oral B vitamins, and if they did so, they used smaller doses than those prescribed by the SAS. This is surprising, particularly as vitamin B deficiencies are prevalent in alcohol-dependent individuals. Furthermore, such deficiencies can lead to serious complications. It is, therefore, important that alcohol-dependent individuals receive early and adequate treatment with B vitamins.
Only a small proportion of both GPs and SAS used parenteral thiamine preparations. It is known that the absorption of oral thiamine in alcohol-dependent individuals is considerably reduced, and therefore patients at high risk of developing Wernicke's encephalopathy may well be best treated with parenteral vitamin therapy. However, such preparations are known to be associated with the occurrence of anaphylactic reactions. It may be for this reason that clinicians have been excessively cautious in their use of such preparations. It would seem sensible to use these preparations in patients who are severely malnourished or unable to take an adequate diet, provided that there are facilities for treating anaphylaxis (Committee on Safety of Medicines, 1989).
GPs were less likely to admit patients with a history of withdrawal complications. This finding is worrying, given that these individuals carry a significant morbidity and mortality when detoxified. There are no nationally agreed guidelines as to which patients should be admitted, however Naik & Brownell (1999) recommend that patient groups with high mortality rates (for example those with a history of delirium tremens or withdrawal seizures) should be admitted during subsequent withdrawal.
Our results highlight several areas in the management of alcohol withdrawal by GPs which raise concern. We would, therefore, recommend training for GPs in this common and important area, and suggest that SAS may have a role in such education.
|
|
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ASSOCIATION OF BRITISH PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY (1995) ABPI Data Compendium. London: Datapharm Publications Ltd.
COMMITTEE ON SAFETY OF MEDICINES (1989) Parenterovite and allergic reactions. Current Problems, 24, 1.
LAPIERRE, Y. D., BULMER, D. R., OVEWUMI, M., et al(1983) Comparison of chlormethiazole (Heminevrin) and chlordiazepoxide (Librium) in the treatment of acute alcohol withdrawal. Neuropsychology, 10, 127-130.
McINNES, G. T. (1987) Chlormethiazole and alcohol: a lethal cocktail. British Medical Journal, 294, 592.
NAIK, P. C. & BROWNELL, L. W. (1999) Treatment of psychiatric aspects of alcohol misuse. Hospital Medicine, 60, 173-177.[Medline]
ROYAL COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS (1986) Alcohol: a Balanced View. London: Royal College of General Practitioners.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |