PB Evidence-Based Mental Health
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2000) 24: 314. doi: 10.1192/pb.24.8.314-a
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryle, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ryle, A.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2000) 24: 314
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


Correspondence

Cognitive-analytical therapy — a most suitable training for psychiatrists?

Anthony Ryle, Honorary Consultant Psychotherapist and Honorary Senior Research Fellow

GKT at the Munro Centre, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT

Sir: Not surprisingly, I welcome the paper by Harvey Rees (Psychiatric Bulletin, April 2000, 24, 124-126).

Cognitive—analytic therapy (CAT) was always intended to offer a NHS-relevant model of psychological therapy and management. Rees comments on the need for a "robust evidence base for its effectiveness", in this respect. It should be noted that the development of the model over the past 25 years has involved both conceptual developments and numerous small scale studies of both process and outcome. These are recorded in three books and over 50 papers published in peer-reviewed journals and a number of further papers are due to appear in a special section of the June issue of the British Journal of Medical Psychology. Much of this work has been focused on borderline personality disorder. Bowing to current definitions of ‘robust’, and despite considerable ethical and design problems, we have now embarked on a large scale randomised controlled trial of 24-session CAT in this category of patients. Despite favourable referees' reports and a completed feasibility study, this inexpensive study of a group of currently neglected patients who have a very low spontaneous recovery rate, a high suicide rate and are high consumers of resources has failed to attract research and development funding.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryle, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ryle, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals