Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 34. doi: 10.1192/pb.25.1.34-a
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 34
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
ECT audit
R. I. McClelland, Professor of Mental Health
Department of Mental Health, School of Medicine, The Queen's University
of Belfast, The Whitla Medical Building, Belfast BT9 7BL
Sir: I read with interest the audit on ECT practice (Brookes et al,
Psychiatric Bulletin, September 2000, 24, 329-330) and would like
to express my appreciation of this important piece of work. As you know, ECT
practice is one of the most empirically-based interventions in mental health
practice with established efficacy and is nevertheless one of the most
controversial, particularly in the public domain. It is also the one area
where we have now produced guidance, albeit guidance that is due for review
and updating. It is essential that where explicit standards exist, the audit
process is implemented at local level to ensure that optional standards are
achieved. There is little justification for the present variation in
psychiatric practice in the administration of ECT in the face of such clear
guidance. This audit and its impact is an example that should be followed
elsewhere. The audit process is key to improving practice at local level and
we should encourage, as a matter of policy, the publication of many more
examples of effective clinical audit.