Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 154. doi: 10.1192/pb.25.4.154-b
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 154
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Patient or Client?
Paul McCrone, Senior Lecturer in Health Economics
Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, De
Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF
Sir: The article by Ritchie et al (Psychiatric Bulletin,
December 2000, 24, 447-450) provides a useful contribution to the
debate about the use of titles. I agree that the term patient is
appropriate for someone who attends a psychiatric outpatient clinic. However,
mental health care is diverse and consists of services provided by numerous
agencies. What title should we give the patient who, after
attending the clinic then visits a day centre run by a voluntary organisation?
This service may be essential for his or her mental health, but surely he or
she is not a patient of the centre's manager. Similarly, the
patient may need home visits from social services but I doubt
whether social workers would regard the person as their patient.
Further confusion occurs when we consider people who have been diagnosed with
a mental health problem but who are well and not in contact with any services.
Ritchie et al's study was context specific and in their context the
term patient seems fine. In other contexts client
or service user may also be suitable. I see two solutions to
this problem. One is an acceptance that one person can have different titles
at the same time, each of which represent the relationship that he or she has
with the service provider. The other is to use a general title that applies to
all situations. How about individual or
person?