PB E-mail content delivery - eTOCs !
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 361. doi: 10.1192/pb.25.9.361
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, S.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 361
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


correspondence

High dose neuroleptics

Sophia Andrews, Senior House Officer in Psychiatry

West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds IP33 2QZ

Sir: Wilkie et al's (Psychiatric Bulletin, May 2001, 25, 179-183) study of high dose neuroleptics was timely and informative. However, it is surprising to note that they consider haloperidol 10 mg to be equivalent to chlorpromazine 100 mg. It is generally regarded that 2 mg of haloperidol is equivalent to 100 mg of chlorpromazine (King, 1995). Moreover, the highest recommended dose of haloperidol in schizophrenia is 30 mg (British Medical Association & Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2001) and not 200 mg as the authors suggest. It is well known that doses of haloperidol higher than 12 mg do not produce any additional clinical benefits while causing increasing side-effects. The findings of the present study suggest that high dose neuroleptic prescribing is not based on sound pharmacological principles. Despite the high profile of pharmacological treatments in psychiatry, psychopharmacology does not appear to have a similar status in the psychiatric trainee's curriculum. I hope that the newfound Psychopharmacology Special Interest Group of the College will rectify this anomaly.

References

BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION & ROYAL PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN (2001) British National Formulary. London & Wallingford: BMJ Books & Pharmaceutical Press.

KING, D. J. (1995) Neuroleptics and the treatment of schizophrenia. In Seminars in Psychopharmacology (ed. D. J. King), pp. 259-327. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals