© 2002 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
© 2002 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Impact of patient suicide on psychiatric trainees
Surrey Oaklands NHS Trust, Department of Psychiatry, Epsom General Hospital, Dorking Road, Epsom, Surrey KT18 7EG
Department of Psychological Medicine, Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley, Surrey GU16 5UJ
Department of Public Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE
See pp. 44-49 and pp. 50-52, this issue. 
 TOP Abstract IntroductionThe studyFindingsCommentReferences |
|---|
AIMS AND METHOD
A survey of 89 psychiatric trainees in a regional rotational training scheme was carried out to investigate the impact immediately after a patient's suicide and at the time of the study. Main outcome measures used were the Impact of Events Scale and a rating scale of the impact on personal and professional life.
RESULTS
Twenty-three trainees out of 53 who returned questionnaires reported at least one suicide. Initial reactions included shock, self-blame, guilt, grief and fear of negligence. Impact on personal and professional life was moderately severe. Over half of the trainees were ‘clinically stressed’ in the immediate aftermath, with no statistically significant reduction over time.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
The impact of a patient suicide can be profound. It can be experienced as a stressful event but can also lead to positive changes in clinical practice. Greater availability of training and support as well as further research in this area are recommended.
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionThe studyFindingsCommentReferences |
|---|
The suicide of a patient is an occupational hazard for psychiatrists and is identified as one of the most stressful adversities of psychiatric training (Kozlowska et al, 1997). Trainees are vulnerable because of their close involvement with patients, relative inexperience, inadequate support and limited understanding of normal reaction to suicide. There are limited data on the impact of patient suicide on trainees.
Brown (1987) reported that 25% of psychiatric trainees had experienced patient suicide, of which 77% had a ‘severe’ or ‘strong’ impact. A study of psychotherapists' responses to patient suicide reported that all the subjects had reacted initially with guilt, anger, disbelief and shock, followed by grief, shame, despair and loss of self-esteem (Goldstein & Buongiorno, 1984).
Chemtob et al (1988) undertook a national survey of psychiatrists in North America using a well-validated instrument — the Impact of Events Scale (IES; Horowitz et al, 1979) — to assess the impact of patient suicide on their personal and professional lives. When compared with a group defined by Horowitz et al (1984), 53% of their subjects initially were ‘clinically stressed’. In an Irish study, 36% of consultant psychiatrists had experienced an impact in the ‘clinical’ range of the intrusion and 17.5% in the avoidance sub-scale of the above instrument (Cryan et al, 1995). Dewar et al (2000) found that, in Scotland, 47% of the psychiatric trainees had experienced a patient suicide, of which 31% reported it to have a deleterious effect on their personal and professional lives.
We report on the impact of patient suicide on psychiatric trainees immediately after the event as well as at the time of study.
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionThe studyFindingsCommentReferences |
|---|
All 89 psychiatric trainees (senior house officers and registrars) in the St George's Hospital Regional Training Scheme in London were sent the following questionnaires:
- General information about the doctor, information about the suicide victim,
outcome of the coroner's inquest, staff/coroner/family attitudes and support
available to the trainee after suicide.
- Impact of suicide on trainee's personal and professional life on a
seven-point scale consisting of 19 questions
(Chemtob et al,
1988).
- Impact on cognitive and emotional state immediately after suicide and
currently as rated by the IES (Horowitz
et al, 1979). This consists of 15 questions about
avoidance and intrusive symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder with a total
score in the range 0-75; a score of 20 or above is considered to be clinically
significant.
The differences between the immediate impact and that at the time of study on both intrusion and avoidance subscales were tested statistically using a two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test. The t-test for two independent samples was used to test differences between groups in the variables rating the impact of suicide.
For trainees who experienced more than one suicide, only the first suicide was investigated.
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionThe studyFindingsCommentReferences |
|---|
Subjects
Fifty-three (60%) trainees responded, of which 23 (43%) had experienced one or more suicides. The median age of the respondents was 31 years (range 26-47 years), with an almost equal gender distribution (11 males and 12 females).
The median interval since leaving medical school was 6 years (range 2-15 years) and the median length of psychiatric training was 28 months (range 1 month to 13 years). The median time interval between the suicide and completion of the questionnaire was 27 months (range 1 month to 3 years).
Victims
Of the 23 victims 10 (43%) were in-patients, seven of whom (30%) were on
leave at the time. Five (22%) were out-patients and eight (35%) had been
discharged from care. Twelve (52%) were considered as being actively at risk
of suicide just before their death. The management had been discussed with
another colleague for 16 cases (70%), whereas only 10 (44%) were seen recently
by a senior doctor. Twenty-one trainees (91%) considered the treatment to have
been appropriate.
Sources of information
Families were interviewed before the suicide in 16 (70%) cases. Information
from previous medical notes was available in 11 (48%), from general
practitioners (GPs) in six (26%) and from other agencies (e.g. Accident and
Emergency departments) in three (13%) cases.
Family reactions
Six (26%) trainees had direct contact with families after suicide. The
families were perceived as having mixed responses including grief, shock,
understanding, accusation and relief.
Staff reaction
An internal inquiry was held in nine cases (39%). None of the trainees
specified the outcome. Most trainees felt supported by other staff members
(n=18, 78%). Five (22%) trainees were involved in the coroner's
inquiry and only one felt accused by the coroner.
Impact of suicide on trainees
The immediate reactions reported by the trainees after the suicide are
shown in Table 1.
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 1. Initial reactions reported by doctors (n=23) |
The effect on personal and professional life was rated using the scale devised by Chemtob et al (1988). The score for each item was divided, as in the original study, into three levels of severity. Eight items yielded mean responses in the middle third, one in the upper third and 10 in the lowest third. On comparing the results of the two studies, our group was found to have less overall impact (Table 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 2. Ratings of the impact of a patient suicide on personal and professional life |
Twenty-one trainees completed the IES twice, so as to measure the response in the 2 weeks after the suicide and that currently. In the immediate aftermath, they had a mean intrusion score of 11.9 (s.d.=8.5) and a mean avoidance score of 9.7 (s.d.=9.21). Chemtob et al (1988) and Horowitz et al (1984) defined clinically significant on the IES as scores greater than 12 on the intrusion subscale and greater than 10 on the avoidance sub-scale. On this basis, clinical intrusion was experienced in the immediate aftermath by seven (33%) and clinical avoidance by six (29%) trainees of our study.
On adding the sub-scales together, 11 trainees (52%) were found to have a clinically significant total score, yielding them clinically stressed according to Chemtob et al (1988). There was no significant change in intrusion between the immediate aftermath and at the time of the study (median change=0, lower quartile=-7, upper quartile=+2; P=0.118). Although there was a tendency for the avoidance score to decrease over time (median=-2, lower quartile=-3, upper quartile=0), it was not significant at the 5% level (P=0.076). On combining the two sub-scales, six trainees (29%) were found to be clinically stressed despite the lapse of time.
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionThe studyFindingsCommentReferences |
|---|
The study was confined to psychiatrists in one regional training scheme in the UK and the sample size was small. The training scheme was well established at the time of the survey and may not fully represent trainees elsewhere. The reasons for the 40% non-response rate were not determined, although it is possible that no suicide was experienced. Alternatively, it may reflect the distress and avoidance consequent to the event. Reliance on recall of the impact is a limitation of this and earlier studies. An active risk was identified in almost half of the cases before the suicide in our study, contrasting with the National Confidential Inquiry's report in which 85% of the cases contacting the services in the week before suicide were assessed as having low or absent immediate risk (Appleby et al, 1999). Low recognition rate may be due to poor information. In our study, information from previous medical notes or GPs had been available in less than half of the cases. The finding that less than half of the patients were seen recently by a senior colleague may suggest poor supervision, which in turn may be owing to time limitation. One of the reasons for little contact with the families after the event could be a fear of accusation, although it was not explored any further. There appeared to be dissonance of the perception by the trainee of the appropriateness of the treatment with the degree of self-blame and guilt that was held. This may be amenable to simple cognitive strategies or informal support from their senior colleagues.
The experience of suicide is potentially adaptive because almost half of the trainees found it to be a useful learning experience and many reported increased focus on suicide cues, although the consequent increased tendency to hospitalise may not always be appropriate with adverse clinical implications. The intensity of the impact of a patient suicide was highlighted by Chemtob et al (1988), who suggested that on average it was as great as that of losing a parent. Surprisingly, we found no significant change over time in the IES. This contrasts with the results of Chemtob et al (1988) and Cryan et al (1995) and may be owing to small sample size, the trainee status of our group and the shorter time interval since the suicide. Brown (1987) proposed that training programmes should collaborate to establish policies for the preparation of trainees should they experience patient suicide. Furthermore, he recommended "psychological first aid" for the trainee in the acute phase, facilitated by the supervisor and the training director, followed by "psychological autopsy" 2 to 6 months later. Schneidman (1981) recommended "psychological autopsy" after every death to investigate the psychological aspects of the death as well as it being a therapeutic tool to the survivors. Dewar et al (2000) reported that the trainees who had received training for the potential consequences of suicide found it of value. Our trainees did not deem preparation in the form of earlier discussion or didactic teaching to be useful, but we believe that an interactive training approach using a modelling technique could be beneficial. In addition, both formal and informal support should be made available routinely.
Our main recommendations for future research on this subject are the use of prospective methodology, a larger sample with a control group and an investigation of the benefits of risk assessment, preparation and supervision on the impact of patient suicide on psychiatrists.
We are grateful to all the trainees who took part in the survey.
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionThe studyFindingsCommentReferences |
|---|
- APPLEBY, L., SHAW, J., AMOST, T., et al (1999) Safer Services. Report of the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness. London: Department of Health.
- BROWN, H. N. (1987) Patient suicide during residency training (1): incidence, implications and program response. Journal of Psychiatric Education, 11, 201-216.
- CHEMTOB, C. M., HAMADA, R. S., BAUER, G., et al
(1988) Patients' suicides: frequency and impact on psychiatrists.
American Journal of Psychiatry,
145,
224-228.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - CRYAN, E. M. J., KELLY, P. & McCAFFREY, B. (1995)
The experience of patient suicide among Irish psychiatrists.
Psychiatric Bulletin 19,
4-7.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - DEWAR, I., EAGLES, J., KLIEN, S., et al
(2000) Psychiatric trainees' experiences of, and reactions to,
patient suicide. Psychiatric Bulletin,
24, 20-23.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - GOLDSTEIN, L. S. & BUONGIORNO, P. A. (1984) Psychotherapists as suicide survivors. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 38, 392-398.[Medline]
- HOROWITZ, M. J., WILNER, N. & ALVAREZ, W. (1979)
Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress.
Psychosomatic Medicine,
41,
209-218.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - HOROWITZ, M. J., WEISS, D. S., KLTREIDER, N., et al (1984) Reactions to the death of a patient. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 172, 383-392.
- KOZLOWSKA, K., NUNN, K. & COUSENS, P. (1997) Adverse experience in psychiatric training, Part 2. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 31, 641-652.[Medline]
- SCHNEIDMAN, E. S. (1981) The psychological autopsy. Suicide and Life-threatening Behavior, 11, 325-340.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  F. Fang, J. Kemp, A. Jawandha, J. Juros, L. Long, S. Nanayakkara, C. Stepansky, L. B. Thompson, and J. Anzia Encountering Patient Suicide: A Resident's Experience Acad Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 31(5): 340 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. R. Foley and B. D. Kelly When a patient dies by suicide: incidence, implications and coping strategies Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., March 1, 2007; 13(2): 134 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. D. Kelly and L. Feeney What every psychiatrist should know Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., November 1, 2006; 12(6): 462 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||