|
|
|||||||||||
Division of Psychiatry for the Elderly, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW
Royal Free and University College Medical School
University of Leicester
St Charles Hospital, London
|
|
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This paper reports the findings of a 1999 survey of academic old age psychiatry staffing and teaching in UK and Irish medical schools.
RESULTS
Just over half had staff established at the level of senior lecturer or above. These schools devoted more time to undergraduate teaching, covered more topics and used a wider range of teaching methods.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
There is a need for further academic development in old age psychiatry to drive the development of the speciality, and to ensure that all medical undergraduates receive an adequate training in this subject area.
|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Method |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Survey 1: academic establishment and development
The senior academic old age psychiatrists in the provided schools were sent
a questionnaire enquiring about the following: date of establishment of old
age psychiatry section; initial staffing establishment; current staffing
establishment; reasons for attrition, if any; sources of funding for academic
posts; location of old age psychiatry within the faculty (e.g. psychiatry,
neuroscience, etc.); links with other departments; and research and teaching
activities.
The heads of the departments of psychiatry in the non-provided schools were sent an alternative questionnaire enquiring about the following: clinical academic old age psychiatry establishment below the level of senior lecturer; non-clinical academic establishment in related areas (e.g. dementia research, epidemiology, psychology); plans for academic developments in old age psychiatry; previous attempts to establish old age psychiatry posts and reasons for failure; and loss of previously established posts and reasons for this.
Survey 2: undergraduate teaching
All schools were also sent a second questionnaire enquiring about their
undergraduate old age psychiatry curriculum, covering whether or not the
curriculum included teaching of old age psychiatry; where in the curriculum
this teaching took place; duration of attachment to this speciality; form and
content of the teaching; student assessment; and past problems and future
plans.
|
|
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Academic establishment and development: provided schools
The response rate to this questionnaire was 12/15 (80%).
Table 1 sets out the current
academic establishment in old age psychiatry (clinical and non-clinical) in
the responding schools. Most schools had increased their numbers of academic
staff in old age psychiatry since they were originally established; only one
school reported attrition of a post because of lack of suitable applicants.
Most academic old age psychiatry units were based in departments of psychiatry
(8, 67%); alternative locations were in neuroscience (2, 17%), clinical
sciences (1, 8%) and public health/primary care (1, 8%). All but two schools
reported active research links between old age psychiatry and other academic
departments. In all but one school the academic old age psychiatrists were
involved in the organisation and delivery of undergraduate and post-graduate
teaching in old age psychiatry, and 10/12 (83%) were involved in the
organisation and delivery of undergraduate teaching in psychiatry more
generally. In two-thirds of the schools, academic old age psychiatrists
contributed to the undergraduate MBBS examination (or equivalent).
|
Academic establishment and development: non-provided schools
The response rate to this questionnaire was 7/13 (54%). Of the responders,
2 (29%) had clinical academic staff in old age psychiatry below the level of
senior lecturer and six (86%) had plans for clinical academic developments in
the speciality. Five schools (71%) had non-clinical academic staff working in
areas related to old age psychiatry. Three reported previously unsuccessful
attempts to establish clinical academic posts, the problems being lack of
resources, an unsupportive university and failure to appoint at interview. One
school had lost a previously established post because the NHS funding was
withdrawn following failure to appoint.
|
|
Undergraduate teaching |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Six schools (provided: 3/15, 20%; non-provided: 4/7, 57%) reported that there had been significant obstacles to introducing and maintaining old age psychiatry teaching in the undergraduate curriculum. These included reduction of time available, insufficient academic or clinical staff, uncoordinated teaching across many modules and problems with colleagues in general psychiatry. Ten schools (provided: 5/15, 33%; non-provided: 5/7, 71%) said that they currently did not have any plans specifically to revise or expand their undergraduate teaching in old age psychiatry, although some of these commented that the whole of their medical curriculum was currently undergoing revision.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several previous studies (Wattis & Arie 1981, 1984; Wattis 1989; Faire & Katona 1993; Gregory & Dening, 1995) have examined the point prevalence of academic posts in old age psychiatry and the practice of undergraduate teaching in this speciality in the UK. In comparison with these, our findings suggest there has been a considerable increase over the past decade both in the number of academic posts and in the amount of undergraduate teaching provided. For example, Faire and Katona (1993) reported a median proportion of psychiatry teaching devoted to old age psychiatry of 15% (range 2.5-25), with a median duration of 6 hours (range 1-14). The findings of the present survey are also better than those recently reported for Australia and New Zealand (O'Connor et al, 1999), where the mean length of old age psychiatry teaching was only 4.2 hours (range 0-7) out of a mean total of 353 hours (1.2%).
However, there is no room for complacency about the present state of academic old age psychiatry in the UK and Ireland. Just over half the medical schools that responded have established departments in old age psychiatry, and the academic establishment in these provided schools is patchy, for example, four departments do not have a chair. Three departments have no clinical lecturers in old age psychiatry, and these posts are likely to decrease further as the demands of the research assessment exercise result in cutting of posts that are seen as less productive in terms of publications and grant income. This is a worrying development, as lecturers represent the seed corn of the next generation of academics, and this survey has shown there is already a dearth of suitable applicants for some academic posts. Given the planned expansion in medical student numbers and the creation of at least three new medical schools in the UK over the next 5 years, the workforce situation nationally looks increasingly bleak. Some established academic sections of old age psychiatry might not continue to be viable if there is an insufficient critical mass of academics to sustain research output.
Because of demographic ageing, all doctors now need to have a good undergraduate training in the assessment and management of mental disorders in old age. Our findings show that those medical schools with established departments provide more teaching of old age psychiatry and are more likely to embrace new teaching methods. It is worrying that students in some medical schools may not be taught the fundamentals of dementia and delirium, although it is possible that this teaching may be provided elsewhere on their course.
At the postgraduate level, although old age psychiatry is now a major speciality within the UK, with 1512 members of the College Faculty of Old Age Psychiatry (539 consultants, including academics: figures as at 13/11/00), many consultant posts remain unfilled because of an inadequate supply of trained specialist registrars. Recent publications such as Forget Me Not (Audit Commission, 2000) and the National Service Framework for Older People (Department of Health, 2001) are likely to stimulate further development of the speciality. If this is to be driven by uniform excellence in teaching and research, then new ways will have to be found to encourage and train individuals in the subject. Both the NHS and universities need to recognise they have a role in fostering and financing the academic growth of the discipline. It would clearly be desirable for currently non-provided medical schools to set up sections of old age psychiatry, but once again the lack of suitably qualified applicants is likely to frustrate this in the short to medium term. However, it is important to demonstrate the need, and clinical old age psychiatry services associated with non-provided schools should be encouraging and supporting the development of NHS-funded academic posts.
|
|
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (2001) National Service Framework for Older People. London: Department of Health.
FAIRE, G. M. & KATONA, C. L. E. (1993) Survey of
undergraduate teaching of old age psychiatry in the United Kingdom.
Psychiatric Bulletin,
17,
209-211.
GREGORY, C. A. & DENING, T. (1995) Teaching old age psychiatry to medical students in England. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 10, 883-886.
O'CONNOR, D. W., CLARKE, D. M. & PRESNELL, I. (1999) How is psychiatry taught to Australian and New Zealand medical students? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 33, 47-52.[Medline]
WATTIS, J. P. (1989) Old age psychiatrists in the United Kingdom their educational role. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 4, 361-363.
WATTIS, J. P. & ARIE, T. (1981) Psychogeriatrics: a national survey of a new style of psychiatry. BMJ, 282, 1529-1533.
WATTIS, J. P. & ARIE, T. (1984) Further developments in psychogeriatrics in Britain. BMJ, 289, 778.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |