Psychiatric Bulletin (2002) 26: 159. doi: 10.1192/pb.26.4.159-b
© 2002 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Psychiatric Bulletin (2002) 26: 159
© 2002 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Book Review
Jed Boardman, Senior Lecturer in Social Psychiatry
Guy's, King's and St Thomas' Medical School, King's College London
Understanding Clinical Papers By David Bowers, Allan House and David
Owens. Chichester: Wiley. 2001. 202 pp. £19.95(pb). ISBN:
0-471-48976-X
Critical Reviews in Psychiatry Edited by Tom Brown and Greg
Wilkinson (2nd edn). London: Gaskell. 2000. 278 pp. £18. ISBN:
1-901242-41-2
With the introduction of the critical reading paper in the
MRCPsych examination one might have expected a plethora of texts on the
subject. This has not been the case and many anxious trainees scramble to find
appropriate texts to help prepare for the examinations. Many of their trainers
struggle to assist and despite the suggestions to orientate journal clubs for
critical appraisal, many remain insufficient for the purpose. Will either of
these books be of assistance?
Critical Reviews in Psychiatry offers a simple solution: let the
trainees practise. The past papers offer them an opportunity to see how others
may have struggled and succeeded in previous examinations. The other papers
with their set questions and model answers give them an opportunity to
practise, an invaluable part of the exam preparation. The model answers might
be better placed separately from the questions to reduce temptation to look at
the answers when the going gets too difficult. The book could be enhanced by
providing an additional section on guided analysis and criticism of the
papers, which may deepen understanding.
However, is this book sufficient? No, but the addition of Understanding
Clinical Papers may help. This book, aimed at a general health audience,
provides 30 short chapters on a range of topics from reading the introduction
of a paper to interpreting graphs and tables, basic designs, numbers and
statistics. The book is written in a clear, chatty style and covers many
concepts important for understanding research papers that often remain an
enigma to trainees (e.g. odds ratios, number needed to treat, confidence
intervals, epidemiological fallacy). Its many examples taken from published
papers from many areas of clinical medicine are enhanced by the use of text
bubbles designed to clearly identify key points the authors wish to make. The
book covers some statistical tests not often dealt with in books of such
length, for example, logistic and Cox regression and survival analysis.
Inevitably in a book of such brevity covering a large area, difficult topics
are not covered in any depth and it would have been helpful if the authors had
referred to other texts that cover the concepts more thoroughly. The book does
not directly deal with experimental design and method and quasi-experimental
design, areas of central importance in understanding much of clinical
research, nor does it cover single case designs. One small gripe with the book
is that its title, Understanding Clinical Papers, is misleading. The
book may assist in understanding clinical research papers, but it goes beyond
this and provides an understanding of a range of important research-related
topics useful to trainees and others.