PB RCPsych Publications
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2002) 26: 315. doi: 10.1192/pb.26.8.315-b
© 2002 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Treloar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Treloar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, J.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2002) 26: 315
© 2002 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


correspondence

Clinically useful electronic patient record

Adrian Treloar, Consultant Psychiatrist

Julie Hunt, Head of IM&T

Correspondence: (e-mail: Adrian.Treloar{at}oxleas.nhs.uk )

Correspondence: (e-mail: Julie.Hunt{at}oxleas.nhs.uk )

Sir: We were delighted to see the report by Searle et al (Psychiatric Bulletin, April 2002, 26, 145-148). We too have had tremendous success with an almost identical system developed in collaboration between the IT department and clinicians (Hunt, 2002). We now have discharge summaries, patient letters and Care Programme Approach reviews available networked across three London boroughs, and multiple sites. Like many others, we found that the patient-based IT systems on offer could not cope with storing and retrieving the complex clinical information that we all need when managing patients. However, using the network that was built to enable communication across the trust, we can now access detailed clinical information 24-hours a day when needed, and have gone a long way to ironing out the information problem caused by community teams being based away from in-patient units. The system has been quick and simple to implement and well-received by staff. The key difference with our project is that each patient has only one file, with multiple pages of separate letters within it. We suspect that this makes retrieval and searching somewhat easier. Interested people are welcome to contact us by e-mail in the first instance.

References

HUNT, J. (2002) The M: drive project. British Journal of Healthcare Computing and Information Management, 19, 20-22.





This Article
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Treloar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Treloar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals