PB Try The British Journal of Psychiatry Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2002) 26: 316. doi: 10.1192/pb.26.8.316
© 2002 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horne, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Horne, R.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2002) 26: 316
© 2002 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


correspondence

Co-prescribing of atypical and typical antipsychotics: true rate much higher

Rebecca Horne, Specialist Registrar

Julian Hospital, Bowthorpe Road, Norwich NR2 3TD

Sir: Taylor et al (Psychiatric Bulletin, May 2002, 26, 170-172) rightly point out that co-prescribing may lead to poorer tolerability and increased frequency of anticholinergic effects. Particular attention was not, however, drawn to the possible cardiac side-effects of co-prescribing, especially in the light of recent evidence of antipsychotics causing QT prolongation and subsequent risk of arrhythmias and possible sudden death (Appleby et al, 2000).

I was also struck by the low rate of coprescribing, 53 out of 1441 prescriptions (4%). In my experience co-prescribing of typicals and atypicals is far more common, especially when ‘as-required’ medication is taken into account. Not including ‘as-required’ medication in the study must result in a significant understimate of the true rate of co-prescribing.

In a recent local audit of antipsychotic prescribing in a group of 160 rehabilitation patients in Norwich, 63 (39%) were prescribed atypical antipsychotics. Of these 32 (50.8%) were also prescribed a typical antipsychotic, 15 (23.8%) regularly and 17 (27.0%) on an as-required basis.

Further research is needed and justification of using a typical and atypical antipsychotic needs to be clear. In a minority of patients, co-prescribing may lead to better symptom control, but, as pointed out, it may be at the expense of increased side-effects.

References

APPLEBY, L., THOMAS, S., FERRIER, N., et al(2000) Sudden unexplained death in psychiatric in-patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 405-406.[Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horne, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Horne, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals