|
|
|||||||||||
correspondence |
Julian Hospital, Bowthorpe Road, Norwich NR2 3TD
Sir: Taylor et al (Psychiatric Bulletin, May 2002, 26, 170-172) rightly point out that co-prescribing may lead to poorer tolerability and increased frequency of anticholinergic effects. Particular attention was not, however, drawn to the possible cardiac side-effects of co-prescribing, especially in the light of recent evidence of antipsychotics causing QT prolongation and subsequent risk of arrhythmias and possible sudden death (Appleby et al, 2000).
I was also struck by the low rate of coprescribing, 53 out of 1441 prescriptions (4%). In my experience co-prescribing of typicals and atypicals is far more common, especially when as-required medication is taken into account. Not including as-required medication in the study must result in a significant understimate of the true rate of co-prescribing.
In a recent local audit of antipsychotic prescribing in a group of 160 rehabilitation patients in Norwich, 63 (39%) were prescribed atypical antipsychotics. Of these 32 (50.8%) were also prescribed a typical antipsychotic, 15 (23.8%) regularly and 17 (27.0%) on an as-required basis.
Further research is needed and justification of using a typical and atypical antipsychotic needs to be clear. In a minority of patients, co-prescribing may lead to better symptom control, but, as pointed out, it may be at the expense of increased side-effects.
References
APPLEBY, L., THOMAS, S., FERRIER, N., et
al(2000) Sudden unexplained death in psychiatric
in-patients. British Journal of Psychiatry,
176,
405-406.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |