Psychiatric Bulletin (2003) 27: 446-448. doi: 10.1192/pb.27.12.446
© 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, C.
Right arrow Articles by Broderick, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, C.
Right arrow Articles by Broderick, W.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2003) 27: 446-448
© 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Drug information quarterly

Sodium valproate or valproate semisodium: is there a difference in the treatment of bipolar disorder?

Chris Fisher, Medical Director and Wendy Broderick, Chief Pharmacist

County Durham and Darlington Priority Services NSH Trust, Earls House Hospital, Lanchester Road, Durham DH15RD,

Declaration of interest

None.


arrow
Introduction
 
The ‘off licence’ use of drugs is common in the UK. One such use is the treatment of bipolar disorder with sodium valproate. This paper reviews the evidence for using the licensed alternative, valproate semisodium, under the headings of licence, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and tolerability.


arrow
Background
 
Valproate (2-propylpentanoic acid) is an anticonvulsant drug used in the treatment of bipolar disorder, although it is only licensed in the UK for the treatment of epilepsy. Valproate is available clinically in a number of forms: these include sodium valproate alone, valproic acid alone, and sodium valproate in combination with valproic acid. In the UK, sodium valproate and valproic acid are available in enteric coated formulations, but this is not the case in the USA. A modified release formulation of a combination of sodium valproate and valproic acid in a 2.3:1 ratio is also available in the UK.

Valproate semisodium (divalproex semisodium in the USA) is a more recent product, marketed in the UK by Sanofi–Synthelabo under the trade name of Depakote. It consists of a compound of sodium valproate and valproic acid in a 1:1 molar relationship in an enteric coated form. This compound dissociates to release valproate ions in the gastrointestinal tract (Food and Drug Administration, 2002).

Sodium valproate circulates in the plasma as the valproate ion, as do valproic acid and valproate semisodium (Zaccara et al, 1988; Perry et al, 2000), and trough valproic acid plasma levels are used to monitor all three. Valproate is protein-bound, with the free fraction concentration-dependent. The exact mechanism of action is not known, but it is thought that valproic acid and its active metabolites are responsible for the antimania activity. The postulated mechanisms of action are potentiation of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), an effect on the protein kinase C pathway or an effect on guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins) (Watson et al, 1998; Brown et al, 2000; Perucca, 2002).

Comparative data on the cost of UK valproate preparations are shown in Table 1 (Department of Health, 2002; MIMS, 2002).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Comparison of valproate semisodium with other preparations

If valproate semisodium and other forms of valproate all act through the final common pathway of the valproate ion, are there any advantages in using the more expensive drug? In order to answer this question we performed a literature search of the Cochrane Library, PsychINFO, Medline (1966 to 2002) and EMBASE (1996 to 2002), using the terms BIPOLAR, MANIA, VALPROATE, VALPROIC ACID, DIVALPROEX, DEPAKOTE and VALPROATE SEMISODIUM.


arrow
Results
 
The results of our research are summarised under the four headings of licence, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and tolerability.

Licence
In the UK, valproate semisodium is the only form of valproate to be licensed for use in bipolar disorder. However, this licence applies only to the acute treatment of mania; the drug is used but not licensed for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. Other forms of valproate are used for treatment of bipolar disorder in the UK although this use is ‘off licence’. Psychiatrists in the UK face a dilemma: recognised guidelines (Taylor et al, 2001) for the treatment of bipolar disorder recommend the use of valproate, but the drug is unlicensed. ‘Off license’ use of drugs by UK psychiatrists is common. Douglas-Hall et al (2001) assessed the scale of ‘off licence’ prescribing across a large number of psychiatric hospitals - it amounted to 7.5% of all prescribing, and sodium valproate for affective disorder was one of the most common of these prescriptions.

Efficacy
Sodium valproate (Pope et al, 1991; Freeman et al, 1992) and valproate semisodium (Bowden et al, 1994) have both been shown to be effective in the treatment of mania. Only one randomised controlled trial has looked at valproate in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder, comparing valproate semisodium with lithium and placebo (Bowden et al, 2000). The study failed to show that valproate semisodium or lithium were more efficacious than placebo, but this failure might have been due to the study design (Macritchie et al, 2001). Further trials of this type are in progress. A randomised open study found valpromide (a pro-drug of valproate) to be of equal efficacy to lithium in maintenance treatment (Lambert & Venaud, 1992). The psychiatric uses of valproate are reviewed by Davis et al (2000); this review does not differentiate between semisodium and other forms of valproate other than when referring to tolerability and side-effects.

Pharmacokinetics
It is commonly held that valproate semisodium has different pharmacokinetic properties from those of enteric coated sodium valproate. Evidence for this can be seen in the recent balance trial protocol (available on the internet at http://www.psychiatry.ox.ac.uk/balance). The balance trial is a UK multi-centre comparison of lithium, valproate, and lithium plus valproate in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder; the protocol states: ‘[valproate semisodium] has more favourable pharmacokinetic properties than valproate preparations’. We were unable to find evidence to support such views. Contact with Sanofi-Synthelabo, the UK manufacturers of valproate semisodium, revealed that they also believed that there were differences in simple pharmacokinetic parameters - maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum concentration (Tmax) and half-life (t1/2) - observed between valproate semisodium and sodium valproate at steady state. They were also of the opinion that valproate semisodium produces higher peak plasma levels, and therefore higher intracerebral levels, than similar doses of sodium valproate. We were referred to Sanofi-Synthelabo data on file F90-196, M93-004 and 491.6.020 (GB188) as supporting evidence; however, the third of these appears to be the same as data published by Roberts et al (1996). Examination of the data shows that the mean Cmax for valproate semisodium at a dose of 500 mg (valproic acid equivalent 500 mg) twice a day is 103 (s.d. 13.5) mg/l. For enteric coated sodium valproate at a dose of 500 mg (valproic acid equivalent 433 mg) twice a day it is 91.33 (s.d. 17.60) mg/l. The Cmax values probably reflect the difference in dose and are not evidence of a difference in pharmacokinetics. The mean Tmax value for valproate semisodium is 3.6 (s.d. 1.1) h and for enteric coated valproate 3.8 h (no s.d. value given). In the case of t1/2, values are remarkably similar and we would question whether there is any significant difference in clinical practice. There is some limited case report evidence to suggest increased bioavailability of valproate from valproate semisodium compared with the same dose of valproic acid, demonstrated by higher trough plasma valproate levels (Demoulin & Landry, 2000).

It is worth noting that other factors can have a major effect on the Tmax and Cmax of valproate preparations: the Tmax can be delayed by about 1 h by administration with food (Sanofi-Synthelabo, 2001), and both parameters are subject to substantial diurnal variation, possibly related to gastric emptying rates (Roberts et al, 1996).

Tolerability
A common opinion is that valproate semisodium has less severe side-effects, and is therefore better tolerated, than enteric coated sodium valproate. This is probably based on the review by Davis et al (2000), who noted that valproate semisodium was better tolerated than valproic acid, with patients less likely to experience gastrointestinal side-effects. They quote Zarate et al (1999) as evidence; similar findings were reported by Brasfield (1999). Both of these studies looked at patient populations in the USA and compared enteric coated valproate semisodium with non-enteric coated valproic acid. It is our view that these studies cannot be used to substantiate claims of improved tolerability of valproate semisodium in the UK where, with the exception of crushable sodium valproate, all solid forms of sodium valproate and valproic acid are enteric coated to reduce gastrointestinal side-effects.


arrow
Conclusion
 
The UK Medicines Control Agency favours the use of licensed drugs over unlicensed alternatives and this is an argument in favour of using valproate semisodium in acute mania as opposed to enteric coated valproate. The argument no longer holds once treatment becomes maintenance. The question of licensed v. unlicensed prescribing needs to be considered in the light of limited health care budgets.

There is no trial that directly compares valproate semisodium with enteric coated sodium valproate in terms of efficacy in bipolar disorder or tolerability. At present, the evidence base does not substantiate claims that valproate semisodium is better tolerated or more efficacious in the treatment of acute mania than enteric coated sodium valproate. The study by Bowden et al (2000), despite its design limitations, is the only randomised controlled trial of maintenance treatment, and here valproate semisodium did not differ from placebo.

The pharmacokinetics of valproate semisodium and enteric coated sodium valproate are remarkably similar and we could find no evidence to support any significant clinical difference. However, it is important to note that valproate semisodium 500 mg tablets contain 15.5% more valproic acid equivalent than sodium valproate 500 mg tablets (Table 1).

A direct comparison of valproate semisodium and enteric coated valproate is required before the conclusions drawn from US data on the improved tolerability of valproate semisodium over other forms of valproate can be applied in the UK, where most other forms of valproate are enteric coated.


arrow
References
 
  1. BOWDEN, C., BRUGGER, A., SWANN, A., et al (1994) Efficacy of divalproex vs lithium and placebo in the treatment of mania. JAMA, 271, 918 -924.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. BOWDEN, C., CALABRESE, J., MCELROY, S., et al (2000) A randomised placebo controlled 12-month trial of divalproex and lithium in treatment of outpatients with bipolar I disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 481 -489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. BRASFIELD, K. (1999) Pilot study of divalproex sodium versus valproic acid drug acquisition costs versus all related costs. Current Therapeutic Research, 60, 138 -144.[CrossRef]
  4. BROWN, C., WANG, J. & YOUNG, L. (2000) Increased expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress proteins following chronic valproate treatment of rat glioma cells. Neuropharmacology, 39, 2162 -2169.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. DAVIS, L., RYAN, W., ADINOFF, B., et al (2000) Comprehensive review of the psychiatric uses of valproate. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 20, (suppl.1), 1 -17s.
  6. DEMOULIN, L. & LANDRY, P. (2000) Plasma concentration of valproate following substitution of divalproex sodium by valproic acid. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 45, 761.[Medline]
  7. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (2002) Drug Tariff, January 2002. London: DoH.
  8. DOUGLAS-HALL, P., FULLER, A. & GILL-BANHAM, S. (2001) An analysis of off-licence prescribing in psychiatric medicine. Pharmaceutical Journal, 267, 890 -891.
  9. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (2002) Depakote® Tablets. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/docs/temptn.cfm.
  10. FREEMAN, T., CLOTHIER, J., PAZZAGLIA, P., et al (1992) A double blind comparison of valproate in the treatment of acute mania. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 108 -111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. LAMBERT, P. & VENAUD, G. (1992) Etude comparative du valpromide versus lithium dans la prophylaxie des troubles thymiques. Nervure, 5, 57 -65.
  12. MACRITCHIE, K., GEDDES, J., SCOTT, J., et al (2001) Valproic acid, valproate and divalproex in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Library, issue 4. Oxford: Update Software.
  13. MIMS (2002) Monthly Index of Medical Specialities, January. London: Haymarket.
  14. PERRY, P., BEVER-STILLE, K., ARNDT, S., et al (2000) Correlation of valproate plasma concentrations and dose in bipolar affective disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 20, 277 -279.[Medline]
  15. PERUCCA, E. (2002) Pharmacological and therapeutic properties of valproate: a summary after 35 years of clinical experience. CNS Drugs, 16, 695 -714.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. POPE, H., MCELROY, S., KECK, P., et al (1991) Valproate in the treatment of acute mania: a placebo controlled study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 62-68.
  17. ROBERTS, D., EASTER, D. & O’BRYANTEAR, G. (1996) Epilim Chrono: a multidose crossover comparison of two formulations of valproate in healthy volunteers. Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition, 17, 175 -182.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. SANOFI-SYNTHELABO (2001) Summary of Product Characteristics-Depakote®. January 2001. http://www.sanofi-synthelabo.co.uk.
  19. TAYLOR, D., McCONNELL, H., DUNCAN-McCONNELL, D. et al (2001) The Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines (6th edn). London: Martin Dunitz.
  20. WATSON, D., WATTERSON, J. & LENNOX, R. (1998) Sodium valproate down-regulates the myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS) in immortalised hippocampal cells: a property of protein kinase C-mediated mood stabilisers. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 285, 307 -316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. ZACCARA, G., MESSORI, A. & MORONI, F. (1988) Clinical pharmacokinetics of valproic acid – 1988. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 15, 367 –389.[Medline]
  22. ZARATE, C., TOHEN, M., NARENDRAN, R., et al (1999) The adverse effect profile and efficacy of divalproex sodium compared with valproic acid: a pharmacoepidemiology study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 60, 232 -236.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 DTBHome page
Drug treatments for bipolar disorder: 1 - Acute manic or depressive
DTB, April 1, 2005; 43(4): 28 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, C.
Right arrow Articles by Broderick, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, C.
Right arrow Articles by Broderick, W.