HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Burns, T. Articles by Catty, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Burns, T. Articles by Catty, J.

Assertive community treatment

Social and Community Psychiatry, Department of General Psychiatry, St George's Hospital Medical School, Jenner Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE

We are delighted that our work is read by such influential figures in the ACT world and that they appreciate our attempt to bring scientific rigour to the area. However, we stand by our conclusions.

It is preceisely because we wished to understand the heterogeneity of results from good services and good studies that we undertook our work. We examined 20 components of home-based care in experimental and control services of published studies. These included, but were not restricted to, ACT studies. Our results (Burns et al, 2001, Catty et al, 2002) show that the clear distinction between ACT and other forms of intensive home-based care that Professor Stein and colleagues insist on, and which Marshall and colleagues (Marshall et al, 1997; Marshall & Lockwood, 1998) used, simply will not withstand scrutiny. Many of the ACT teams did not have all the ‘ACT’ characteristics and many of the ‘non-ACT’ teams had more of them. In short, the groups overlap. It is for this reason that we conducted our regression analysis to determine which components are associated with outcome. Many of these ‘effective ingredients’ were present in later study control services. We would argue that this is why big differences are no longer being found in US or European studies.

None of this is to take away from the epoch-making impact of Stein and Test's original study. If we are to progress in our understanding of community care, however, we must be prepared to test more sharply-focused questions with increasingly well-designed studies.

References

BURNS, T., KNAPP, K., CATTY, J., et al (2001) Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment, 5, 1-139.

CATTY, J., BURNS, T., KNAPP, K., et al (2002) Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 32, 383-401.[CrossRef][Medline]

MARSHALL, M. & LOCKWOOD, A. (1998) Assertive Community Treatment for People with Severe Mental Disorders. Oxford: The Cochrane Library.

MARSHALL, M., GRAY, A., LOCKWOOD, A., et al (1997) Case Management for People with Severe Mental Disorder. Oxford: The Cochrane Library.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Burns, T. Articles by Catty, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Burns, T. Articles by Catty, J.