PB Try Advances in Psychiatric Treatment Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2004) 28: 383. doi: 10.1192/pb.28.10.383-a
© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haeney, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haeney, O.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2004) 28: 383
© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


Correspondence

The objective structured clinical examination

Owen Haeney

Senior House Officer to Professor Oyebode, Queen Elizabeth Psychiatric Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2QZ

I read with interest the recent letter regarding the Part I MRCPsych OSCE (Yak et al, Psychiatric Bulletin, July 2004, 28, 265–266). However, I disagree with some conclusions.

From personal experience, most candidates feel that the OSCE does provide a fairer assessment of their skills, and I do not believe that the process of dissecting skills into an OSCE format is inherently harmful to the training of future psychiatrists. There are many important clinical skills that can be comfortably demonstrated within seven minutes; first-rank symptoms must be elicited before their context can be understood.

However, I would agree that too often, time itself becomes the major hurdle. This is quite contrary to clinical practice. If a difficult patient takes longer than expected in clinic, we would not rush them out, or end prematurely, but would take the necessary time and if required the clinic would overrun. The emphasis of the exam should not be different.

I am also concerned with the progression of the type of vignettes seen in the three OSCE exams so far. From the initial, very reasonable subjects, the cases are rapidly evolving into unreasonable scenarios. How many of us saw cases of temporal lobe epilepsy during our first year in psychiatry?

The OSCE exam, therefore, is less than perfect, but at least fair. I remain more concerned about the Part II examination, where candidates struggle against the hopelessness of the uncontrollable variables of patient and examiners. Perhaps it is the candidates, rather than the chief examiner, who adopt the mantle of Sisyphus (Tyrer & Oyebode, British Journal of Psychiatry, March 2004, 184, 197–199).




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

OSCE
Dr Amitav Narula, et al.
PB Online, 3 Nov 2004 [Full text]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haeney, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haeney, O.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals