Psychiatric Bulletin (2004) 28: 265. doi: 10.1192/pb.28.7.265-b
© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Psychiatric Bulletin (2004) 28: 265
© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Sociological support for importance of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)
Cornelia Thiels, Professor of Social Medicine
Department of Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Bielefeld,
Germany
The timely article by Bhugra et al (Psychiatric Bulletin,
February 2004, 28, 36-39) may not be welcomed by all readers.
Therefore, I would like to support their view that psychiatrists - and indeed
other physicians - should take an interest in whatever their patients resort
to for relief of symptoms. For additional reading, I recommend a chapter by
Goldstein (1999). Already more
than 10 years ago, it was estimated that Americans made considerably more
visits to unconventional providers than to all primary care physicians. By so
doing, they spent $13.7 billion more than they spent out of pocket on
conventional care that same year. Some insurance companies and health
maintenance organisations offer coverage for some forms of alternative care.
Listings in the Healthy Yellow Pages for Los Angeles are hilarious
and informative alike.
In the 16th century, few liked to believe that the earth is not the centre
of the universe. Now, most medically trained people prefer to perceive
themselves as central to providing health care. The perspective seems to be
different for many on the receiving end.
References
GOLDSTEIN, M. S. (1999) The growing acceptance of
complementary and alternative medicine. In Handbook of Medical
Sociology (ed C. E. Bird, P. Conrad & A. M. Fremont), pp. 284
-297. Harlow: Pearson Education
Limited.