PB Handbook for Psychiatric Trainees
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 436-437. doi: 10.1192/pb.29.11.436-b
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kunar, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kunar, S. S.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 436-437
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


Correspondence

Physical health of patients in rehabilitation and recovery

Satnam Singh Kunar, Staff Grade in Rehabilitation Psychiatry

St Michael’s Hospital, St Michael’s Road, Warwick CV34 5QW, e-mail: sskunar{at}hotmail.com

I read with interest the article by Dr Greening (Psychiatric Bulletin, June 2005, 29, 210-212). I have recently undertaken an audit of the physical healthcare of patients in our rehabilitation and recovery unit in Warwick. Unfortunately, my preliminary results show a similar picture to that reported by Dr Greening.

However, we do have a local general practitioner (GP) who has two sessions allocated per week for the review of any physical health problems: the type of ‘shared care approach’ suggested by Lester (2005) and Bickle (2005). It must be stressed though that it is not the responsibility of our GP colleagues to trawl through reams of notes (which most rehabilitation patients have) but rather up to the psychiatric team to ensure that patients are having appropriate investigations that can then be discussed with primary care.

For my audit I initially drew up a ‘checklist’ (standards) of the investigations that patients should have depending on what type of medication they are prescribed and how often, if at all, this ought to be repeated. I used the Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines, British National Formulary and consulted pharmaceutical companies in drawing up the standards for each psychotropic agent - one must not forget mood stabilisers and antidepressants that also require monitoring. Although rather time-consuming, it is a more rigorous method than collating the views of colleagues as done by Pitman (2005) prior to audit and is better than a battery of ‘routine tests’ which may be incomplete.

In addition, we have put together a health screen protocol for each patient that not only looks at issues such as diet, smoking, body mass index and exercise but also, among other things, posture/mobility, eyes, ears, teeth/oral hygiene, hair/scalp, immunisation history (although this can be difficult!), menstrual cycle, urinary tract infections and constipation. Each female will also be given appointments for mammograms and cervical smear tests when necessary, as well as leaflets on breast examination. All male patients will be given leaflets on testicular examination, provided by the primary care service. We will review the protocols annually but some areas will need to be addressed more often.

The reasons for regular review of the physical healthcare of psychiatric patients are well documented. I hope that by implementing these protocols using the shared care approach we are promoting a better quality of life that our patients deserve.

References

BETHLEM & MAUDSLEY NHS TRUST (2003). The Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines, 7th edn. London: M. Dunitz.

BICKLE, A. R. (2005) Physical health of patients in rehabilitation and recovery: a case for surveying all records? (eLetter to Psychiatric Bulletin). http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/eletters/29/6/210#399

BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION & ROYAL PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN (2005) British National Formulary (March issue). London & Wallingford: BMJ Books & Pharmaceutical Press.

LESTER, H. (2005) Shared care for people with mental illness: a GP’s perspective. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 11, 133 -139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

PITMAN, A. L. (2005) Lack of consensus over standards for physical investigations for psychiatric in-patients. (eLetter to Psychiatric Bulletin). http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/eletters/29/6/210#399





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kunar, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kunar, S. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals