HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hynes, F. Articles by Muchemenye, O. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hynes, F. Articles by Muchemenye, O. G.

Ward rounds – patients’ views

West Midlands Forensic Psychiatry Rotation, Hillis Lodge, Hollymoor Way, Northfield, Birmingham B31 5HE, e-mail: fhynes{at}doctors.org.uk

O. G. Muchemenye, Senior House Officer

Low Secure Forensic Rehabilitation Service, Birmingham

We have similar concerns regarding patients’ views of ward rounds to White & Karim (Psychiatric Bulletin, June 2005, 29, 207–209). Our service is a low secure forensic unit, which provides long-term rehabilitation in the West Midlands, and in contrast to general adult services in-patients have a 4-weekly ward round slot.

A recent review of records of 12 in-patients over a 6-month period highlighted that patient attendance at ward rounds has been poor – 2 patients attended frequently, 6 occasionally and 4 never. White & Karim fail to mention that standard nursing practice is to provide selective written and verbal feedback to patients after the ward round. Therefore the patients may feel that they do not need to attend as they receive comprehensive feedback without undergoing the ward round experience.

Hodgson et al (Psychiatric Bulletin, May 2005, 29, 171–173) stressed the compromise position of the ward round as it struggles to serve both professional and patient needs. The duties of a doctor according to the General Medical Council include the need to respect the rights of patients to be fully informed in decisions about their care, to give patients information in a way they can understand and to listen to patients. By maintaining the practice of ward rounds in which patients choose not to participate, are we failing to involve patients in decisions about their care? Patients want individual consultant time and ward rounds do not allow this. Perhaps the way forward is to have both a team meeting followed by individual patient time with a consultant.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hynes, F. Articles by Muchemenye, O. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hynes, F. Articles by Muchemenye, O. G.