Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 232. doi: 10.1192/pb.29.6.232
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 232
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Research for the sake of research
Pavan Chahl, Staff Grade in General Adult Psychiatry
Hellesdon Hospital, Norwich
I wholeheartedly agree with the views expressed by Nicola Phillips in her
letter Who wants to be a specialist registrar? (Psychiatric
Bulletin, March 2005, 29, 115). One of the biggest worries one has
when applying for specialist registrar posts is the absence of research
experience on ones CV.
Research is clearly very important for the advancement of psychiatry or for
any other specialty for that matter. It is also important that trainees be
encouraged to do research work. But does every single trainee have to do
research work? Not everybody has the same aptitudes and interests; research
for the sake of research is not very helpful. Some trainees are more
interested in being good clinicians or have other special interests. For
example, a special interest in psychotherapy should be given the same weight
age as one in research.
It is also time to consider the research day that all registrars are given.
It might not be the most effective use of time for someone who is not
interested in research. As much as science needs good research, patients need
good clinicians and psychiatry needs professionals with different
interests.